On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 1:34 PM, Mary Yugo <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 11:05 AM, Joshua Cude <[email protected]>wrote: > >> >> And the nice thing about passive energy storage, is that it allows Rossi >> plausible deniability of intent to commit fraud. He can admit to some >> storage, but his claim was based on dry steam, which he can insist he >> believed was the case. So everything is tied up neatly. >> > > Maybe it does for some of the public demos but it hardly takes him off the > hook for the claim of a 35 kW heater that ran for a year nor does it take > him off the hook for claiming that 12 explosions took place nor for Levi's > 18 hour test. And it won't take him off the hook if his customer doesn't > exist and if the pending order for 13 reactors and all the backlog of > orders Rossi claim never take place. > I was referring to legal outs. I don't think any of those claims will lead to accusations of fraud. Or could they?
