Am 24.11.2011 21:34, schrieb Mary Yugo:
Another possible problem with the paper at
http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/EssenHexperiment.pdf is that they don't
say where and how they measured input power with their ammeter. Maybe
they say it
[snip]
My suspicion is that K&E did it correctly with the line cord but that
either Rossi had a hidden way to provide more power to the device or
that he spiked the reaction mixture somehow. Obviously I have no way
to know. This continuing discussion emphasizes yet once more why
independent tests are required and why they need to run a longer time.
If Rossi wanted he could make a perfect setup in his own rooms where the
ecat is in a blackbox and only input and output energy is measured with
approved standard methods.
This, made in a convincing and visible way, with some competent and
trustable witnesses who can also make redundant heat and electricity
values, would convince me and all sceptics, the patholotical sceptics
excluded.
Any customer can do this, so why does he say, he cannot do it, because
he has no patent?
If he does such a proof he can get a patent without theoretic foundation.
This is very suspicious.
Peter
