Cude's careful examination of the details of the October 28 demo prove that excess heat was specifically not established by the data, according to his obvious, simple analysis of how fast a large increase in reactor core temperature could heat the large thermal mass of the cooling water flow -- proponents are ignoring or talking past his points, which he has clarified patiently over and over in recent weeks.
I agree Rossi is deluded and caught up in many neurotic patterns. within mutual service, Rich Murray On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 3:02 AM, Alain dit le Cycliste <alain.sep...@gmail.com> wrote: > Rossi's behavior is quite coeherent with a soft-paranoid version. > > Scam is not defendable. > > let's imagine the option. > > MY say, there are no clients, or fake client (actor, friend of scam). > if no client, no cash from clients. (as say MV here) > where from ? from investors ? > no public share sales... > where is the scam ? > no room for it. > > if client is real : > - that client agree to pay billions if it works, big bucks. > - he have to be suspicious because he know that CF is officially a scam or a > mistake. at least shareholders ask him for Due Diligence. > -> he can pay a billion, so he cam pay a good lab engineer, and even a > magician to check all. > -> he can bring meters > - he was accepted to supervise the experiment touching the pipes and boxes, > allowed to installe meters where possible, outside only, but Rossi cannot > refuse any reasonabledemand > -> the client have put meters every where useful for him > -> he have checked all he want out of the boxes > -> he use also his own body captors (noise, heat, smell) to confirm > mesures > > -> saying that the client can bee fooled by wet steam, is taking him stupid. > the client is not a scientist, but a business engineer prepared to see a > fraud. > -> however he might don't care about the precision of measure, provides that > +/- 20% it is what he want... even having half the power is a happy end... > you don't drop your chicken if it produce only small golden eggs. > > so: > - if the machine consume much, sure he know it , > - if it has stored heat in thermal mass, he can feel it (smell, room temp, > IR rays, thermometers) > > however: > - rossi and the client don't care about us... like in poker, if you don't > pay, you don't see. moreover we are not even on the table. > - doubt is good for Rossi and his client, because it slow competitors and > finance market reaction. > - rossi is a man who fight against the unbelief, the trash mafia, the > government politicians and ecologists, nearly get ruined, get to jail, see > the physicists community treat regular scientific studies as fraud without > considering facts... he cannot be easily trusting... he have to be > paranoid, rebel, stubborn, dubious, .... > > the behavior of Rossi&co seems strange, but first it can be analyzed logical > if you assert that there is a running pattent and commercial war. > but I'm even thinking that all Rossi behavior is not only rational, but > simply "emotional"... > he have so much pain, hate, furor, pride, fear, that his behavior is more > like the one of a wild roof cat than a bedroom cat. > > anyway, his behavior is far from a plain old scam. > at worst he might be (badly) lying about the performance of his baby... it > is a bit what he did, and admit, about the instability of his reactor. > NI partneship is thus a good business answer (as an engineer I'll do the > same, to fight DGT, or else as my former schoolmates and Eng. schools). > > as I say befor, the proposed scenarii for scam, error, and so on ar not > credible... > > as incredible as the 9/11 complot. too many people in the scam, too much > complex for the goal, to much budget... > should go to Occam's Barber Shop. > > >
