Horace, I have suggested that your FEA program would be able to demonstrate the time domain operation of the scam ECATs. I assumed that you have device temperature as a function of x,y,z and t so that we can observe the expected operation of the ECATs. Could you confirm that this is true? As you are aware, several of our members are suggesting that the power output is changing far to fast to be real and I am hoping you can tell us what your model predicts.
It is much to difficult to solve this type of partial differential equation by gut feelings. If you do not have temperature as a function of x,y,z,t then what does the FEA program calculate? Thanks, Dave -----Original Message----- From: Peter Heckert <peter.heck...@arcor.de> To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com> Sent: Sat, Nov 26, 2011 3:32 pm Subject: Re: [Vo]:Large Temperature Increase of Core Not Required for 6 to 1 Output Delta Am 26.11.2011 21:15, schrieb Mary Yugo: On Sat, Nov 26, 2011 at 8:23 AM, Terry Blanton <hohlr...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sat, Nov 26, 2011 at 11:11 AM, David Roberson <dlrober...@aol.com> wrote: > > Horace hibernates this time of year. Speaking about hibernation, there could be a contest to make the best caption for this image: http://scienceblogs.com/startswithabang/upload/2011/11/cold_fusion_is_it_possible_is/Focardi_Rossi_apparatoBN-thumb-500x375-70854.jpeg Best I've seen so far (on the Moletrap forum, by "Alsetolokin"): "I dunno, Andrea, why is it so cold in here? Maybe you should try banging on the pipes -- it sometimes works in my building." ;-)
