You misread the graph. Ask Horace to help you understand what it shows as he has the program that answers your question. Direct any further inquires to him. I am confident he can straighten your problem out.
A graph is worth many words Cude. It is clear that a large instantaneous fixed heat source generates a delay which is followed by a rapidly increasing gradient. Look at the graph more carefully. Dave -----Original Message----- From: Joshua Cude <joshua.c...@gmail.com> To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com> Sent: Mon, Nov 28, 2011 10:28 am Subject: Re: [Vo]:Large Temperature Increase of Core Not Required for 6 to 1 Output Delta On Sat, Nov 26, 2011 at 10:39 PM, David Roberson <dlrober...@aol.com> wrote: OK Horace, You have supplied the information that is needed to answer the questions. By my reading of the graphs, they contradict your ideas. They show that a step increase in the power input results in a very gradual increase in the power output to half the input over a period of 3 hours. The only graphs that show rapid increases are related to some kind of active control, and in those cases the power increases are extremely brief spikes. Rossi's claims require a step increase in the power by a factor of 7 and then a new plateau at the higher power.
