On Sat, Nov 26, 2011 at 4:34 PM, Terry Blanton <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 26, 2011 at 7:30 PM, Giovanni Santostasi > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > What Mary is describing is the only rational course of action. What > Rossi is > > doing is what a scam artist would do > > And, in your opinion, how does this scam artist profit from the alleged > scam? > Terry, I'm shocked. You're making me repeat it *again*. For what? The fifth time? OK. Nobody else read this but Terry. I apologize in advance to everyone else. Here goes again -- maybe I should put it in a web site and just link it each time someone asks: If it's a scam, it's an INVESTOR scam, like Steorn, in which the investors pay up front and along the way millions and millions of dollars to the scammer to share in the profits of the invention. They often do so without proper vetting and testing (just as they did with Steorn). The scammer protects himself with non-disclosure agreements and with strong disclaimers saying the work being paid for is "best effort" only and "every investment including this one has significant risk including losing all your money". You see that all the time in penny stock scams that net big bucks from gullible people. Investors are unable to sue due to disclaimers and NDA's they signed or they are too embarrassed to be seen as the dupes they were. And they get a tax writeoff. Also Rossi *already* got money described as a "significant part of the equation" from Ampenergo. The link (again at least the fifth time) is here: http://www.nyteknik.se/nyheter/energi_miljo/energi/article3179019.ece Nobody knows who else gave him money -- people offer it to him all the time various places on the internet including his blog. One can make plenty of money with a scam without selling a thing. If you can demonstrate by any means other than quoting him that Rossi ever sold anything, please feel free to do so.
