Mary Yugo <[email protected]> wrote:

> Jed can tell us for himself but if I recall, his inquiry was for others
> who had pretty well lined pockets.
>

Credibility galore. That's what they said they wanted. I have no idea why
they have delayed, or why they are keeping such a low profile. I suppose
they have their reasons.

They said they will have demonstrations soon. I hope they mean it, and they
will be able to do so.

I understand why Rossi is keeping such a low profile and why he uses
misdirection. He is trying to stir up enough interest to sell reactors for
a million bucks each, without triggering an avalanche of interest. Maybe
Defkalion is playing the same balancing act? I have no idea. There is not
much point to speculating.

Rossi has guts. He takes risk. Yet I wish he would go for broke, and take
an even bigger risk. I wish he would stir up so much interest, the public
might rally supports his effort to get a patent. I think I would do that if
I were in his place. I will grant, he might lose everything. But he might
lose everything with this strategy too. Just about everything. He might
sell a dozen reactors and make ~$15 million in profit, and then lose
control of the product after that.

Rossi or Defkalion are bound to be delayed for various reasons. Radical new
R&D can never go smoothly. We have to cut them a lot of slack. I was
astounded the Rossi was able to do his large demonstration in October as he
announced he would months earlier. Just getting it done was a tremendous
accomplishment. The fact that it was only half of the planned power level
is trivial.

- Jed

Reply via email to