On 13 December 2011 23:25, Jed Rothwell <[email protected]> wrote:
> The higher temperature might as well be due to a slightly increased pressure
> inside the Ecat resulting in a higher boiling point
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax calculated this many months ago. If steam was
saturated (what is almost certain), then there must have been
considerable amount of steam produced in order to explain one degree
temperature increase. Even if the orifice for the outlet hose was
relatively small. That means that at least 60-80 % of the water must
have been vaporized inside ecat in order to explain excess pressure
and temperature of the steam.
This kind of analysis is of course vain, if we assume a fraud, because
it is easy to manipulate thermocouple readings (just write a fake
computer software, not very difficult). But if we assume, that the
setup was real and honest, then data shows quite clearly, that ecat
was operating rather well with Mats Lewan.
However, it is very sad, that Lewan forgot to do simple steam sparging
test, what would have been given simple datapoint of the overall
performance. He had all the the necessary _scientific_ instruments: A
cell phone's clock for timing, thermometer and the famous blue water
bucket.
So, there is just one person to blame if data is hard to analyze and
that is Mats Lewan! So Mats is the real culprit behind the great ecat
hoax! ^^
–Jouni
