Charles Hope <[email protected]> wrote: Are there any examples of pathological science persisting 20 years without > being properly debunked?
Not to my knowledge. Unless you count things like water memory, which may be real after all, and acupuncture and chiropractic, which seem to work. Are there any examples of new science remaining on the fringe for 20 years > before being finally accepted into the mainstream? > Genetics, photography and semiconductors. See: http://www.lenr-canr.org/acrobat/RothwellJcomparison.pdf Countless others, such as electric motors, incandescent lights and and calculators took decades to be developed. They were considered laboratory curiosities with no future and no practical value. - Jed
