I've been informed of another typo/mistranslation. Celani has been working
with (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Giuliano_Preparata)
friend of Eugene Mallove
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qq6YY8eFeYI&feature=related one of the first
mainstream science's physicist that believed in cold
fusion and worked with Martin Fleischmann in Milan in the late 90's:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=35T-gAvaKn4:

>
> According to Celani the reaction between Ni and H would be catalyzed by "
> PHONONS <http://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fonone> ". The phonons are not
> particles but the points where it contacts the thermal-electromagnetic
> waves in phase, produced by thermal agitation in the lattice of nickel. Are
> points of "summation" of multiple heat waves produced by a variety of
> nickel atoms that vibrate at the same frequency ... these frequencies
> would provide hydrogen (as HYDRIDES?) the ability to overcome the Coulomb
> barrier <http://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barriera_di_Coulomb> and make the
> merger of its proton to the core of nickel (as I understand it). [Editor's
> note. I'm asking Celani verification of this and other points of his
> speech]
>
> The power density is very high, and some of his reactions Celani has
> exceeded 1400 watts per gram of nickel, which is higher than that of
> uranium fission in the "cladding" Zirconium.Although Celani you hear talk
> about "technological reality", as it has exceeded 200% yield (ie COP=2) for
> two weeks.
>
> Celani has worked very hard with the great Japanese scientist Arata. The
> Japanese government has funded plenty of not only the research but also
> those of three foreign groups who have had full access to the laboratory by
> Arata.
>
> Celani was able to perform various types of experiment and measurement,
> even the "craziest".
>
> Among these groups was that of MIT and INFN (Italian national institute of
> Nuclear Physics; Celani et al).
>
> Worked with the Arata DEUTERIUM ... but as the import and production of
> Deuterium prohibited by the peace agreements had to self-refine it with the 
> sulfur-iodine
> cycle <http://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ciclo_zolfo-iodio> .
>
> Arata was also excess power of 60 watts, which is easily measurable. The
> improvement over Fleishman and Pons was when he abandoned the traditional
> Arata electrode foil. Not only that, the best layers were not perfectly
> flat, shiny but rather rough, porous, etc..
>
> In short, had to increase the surface area of ​​contact between palladium
> and deuterium.
>
> "When he returned to Italy, Celani modified experiments (*along with
> Professor Giuliano Preparata*)
> and began to use wires of nickel and hydrogen at high pressure
> (eliminating water, oxygen and ' 
> Oxonian<http://www.treccani.it/enciclopedia/ossonio/>
>  )
>

> He realized that the power increased by using highly porous nickel. He
> returned to Japan. There Arata began to experiment with nickel of every
> size possible. He found that the nickel nanopowder in aggregates of less
> than 20 Ångström you had the best reactions.
>
> Indeed, the reaction took place (although not as powerful) even at room
> temperature.
>
> As for gammas they are an end product of the reaction, not desired by
> Celani, that you can do without.
>
> By applying radio frequency (microwave) to dust (I did not know whether
> that of Rossi or his), he had a massive production of gamma rays, which 
> Celani does
> not want and does not consider useful.
>
> As the catalyst for him are metals such as platinum or palladium (must
> resist the micro-points where the heat reaches thousands of degrees,
> ionizing hydrogen)
>
> Celani comes to scientific reality PROCESS.
>
> Celani says that the Greeks of today have passed Defaklion Rossi, from the
> technological point of view. [Editor's note. others believe that
> Defkalion has put together a nice frame and a beautiful body ... but do
> not have the "engine"].
>
> He says that this attitude of secrecy is "stupid" [ed. Celani is
> understandably affected by a) not being invited to the demonstration of 28
> October and 2) the negative response to the proposal of Rossi independent
> testing under the aegis of INFN], and in the end, continue along this road
> will not have the triumph of science and industrial deserves it. According
> to Celani, Rossi arrives to yield around 600%.
>

Reply via email to