On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 6:43 AM, Jed Rothwell <[email protected]> wrote:
> Susanna Gipp <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> Do we have something else excepts a bunch of words ? > > > Yes, data. > Ampenergo, like Levi/February 2011 are not data. They are hearsay and bad hearsay at that because the conditions under which the results were obtained are not specified nor do we know the materials and methods. It may be evidence but it's the flimsiest and least credible that qualifies as "evidence". As to the relationship to Rossi, as a minimum, Ampenergo supposedly is Rossi's US distributor. And they are, so far, nothing but a one screen web site with no content. Ampenergo is hardly independent of Rossi and hardly a force of any sort to be considered seriously. | You know nothing about this, except for McKubre's slide. You cannot judge. If you have some inside knowledge and you expect anyone to rely on it, you have to state it a lot more convincingly than that! As to the comparison with Edison, when Rossi lights up Manhattan with cold fusion energy, let us know.
