On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 9:25 AM, Jed Rothwell <[email protected]> wrote:
> Mary Yugo <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> Yes, data. >>> >> >> Ampenergo, like Levi/February 2011 are not data. They are hearsay . . . >> > > No, the data shown by McKubre is not hearsay or secondhand. It is from > Ampenergo. > And I say again: Ampenergo is Rossi's N. American distributor and has done and showed nothing unless one counts what you claim they did and that claim is without evidence. > > and bad hearsay at that because the conditions under which the results >> were obtained are not specified . . . >> > > They were not specified to you. They were to me, McKubre and others. > Regrettably, they have not granted me permission to upload the other > screens with more details. I do not know why. > All I can say about that is the old British expression: " 'tis a pity!" You don't know why? Could it be because, like is probable about Levi's experiment, they would not stand up to close and proper scrutiny and of course, there is no way for anyone to replicate the experiment and the experiment has never been repeated and has never been independently replicated? Sort of same old/same old Rossi/Defkalion story. Lots of noise and absolutely no cheese.
