100 watts per gram ("," = "." outside of old British Empire) would be about
the same as the 100kW/kg that Rossi is claiming.It is a great pity that these great results from Focardi, Preparata et al 15 years ago were not followed up on by others back then - can only have been because other researchers either didn't hear about it, or didn't think it was credible. On 12 January 2012 15:09, James Bowery <jabow...@gmail.com> wrote: > Ever since talk began about increasing cathodic charge carriers emerging > with temperature at high loadings I've been trying to recall the name of > the early researcher who attached an anode directly to his cathode as well > as having an anode in the electrolyte, and I finally found the cite in > "Excess Heat" by Charles Beaudette: > > ICCF-6 "Progress In New Hydrogen Energy", p. 136 > > The researcher was Preparata. > > Moreover, Beaudette makes some astounding statements about Preparata's > work: > > "*The same [result] was observed in the about fifty similar experiments > that we have conducted." That result produced a power density of 100,000 > watts per cm^3...*" > > > All I can say is "WTF?????" >
