World Pd reserves are about 1 billion troy
ounces<http://palladium-bar.blogspot.com/2007/09/palladium-reserves-and-palladium.html>.
Pd density is 12.02gm/cm^3. If it were all dedicated to power production
at 100,000W/cm^3 the Pd cold fusion nameplate capacity would be:
([1E9 * ounce_troy] * [{12.02 * gramm} / {(centi*meter)^3}]^-1) * ([100 *
{kilo watt}] / [{centi*meter}^3]) ? watt
= 2.5876415E14 W
over 200 terawatts.
World energy demand for all sources of energy is now at:
474e18J/year?W
(4.74E20 * joule) / year ? watt
= 1.5030441E13 W
under 20 terawatts.
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 9:28 AM, Robert Lynn <robert.gulliver.l...@gmail.com
> wrote:
> 100 watts per gram ("," = "." outside of old British Empire) would be
> about the same as the 100kW/kg that Rossi is claiming.
>
> It is a great pity that these great results from Focardi, Preparata et al
> 15 years ago were not followed up on by others back then - can only have
> been because other researchers either didn't hear about it, or didn't think
> it was credible.
>
>
> On 12 January 2012 15:09, James Bowery <jabow...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Ever since talk began about increasing cathodic charge carriers emerging
>> with temperature at high loadings I've been trying to recall the name of
>> the early researcher who attached an anode directly to his cathode as well
>> as having an anode in the electrolyte, and I finally found the cite in
>> "Excess Heat" by Charles Beaudette:
>>
>> ICCF-6 "Progress In New Hydrogen Energy", p. 136
>>
>> The researcher was Preparata.
>>
>> Moreover, Beaudette makes some astounding statements about Preparata's
>> work:
>>
>> "*The same [result] was observed in the about fifty similar experiments
>> that we have conducted." That result produced a power density of 100,000
>> watts per cm^3...*"
>>
>>
>> All I can say is "WTF?????"
>>
>
>
