He meant that only 62 and 64 transmutes. So, he maximizes their quantity to
increase the energy density.

2012/1/21 John Milstone <[email protected]>

> On Fri, 20 Jan 2012 22:34:07, thorium breeder said:
>
> > Can rossi achieve "do it yourself isotopic separation"?
>
> That ties in to the missing "detailed isotopic analysis" that Sven
> Kullander promised "before Christmas".
>
> I've been trying to find prices for specific Nickel isotopes, and no one
> seems to be publishing their prices online.  Does anyone here know (or can
> find out) how much a gram of enriched 61Ni (for example) costs?  Rossi
> claims to be enriching his Nickel "fuel" for no more than pennies a gram
> (otherwise, he couldn't be selling the 100g per 10KW E-Cat for $10).
>
> Rossi claims that the enrichment of Nickel is not part of the operation of
> the E-Cat.  (
> http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=510&cpage=23#comment-101088)
>
> Rossi also claims that the "ash" will have returned to the natural
> isotopic ratios, so maybe testing the "ash" is a waste of time  (
> http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=473&cpage=1#comment-32104)
>
> Hopefully, Kullander has been testing the pre-processed fuel as well as
> the resulting ash.  Certainly, one or the other of those will show
> compelling evidence of some LENR process going on (or not).
>
> If, has been rumored, 30% of the fuel transmutes into either Copper or
> Iron, it would be worth knowing whether the resulting particles contained
> mixtures of the various elements (which would be consistent with real
> transmutation) or whether each particle consisted of only one element
> (which would not).
>
>


-- 
Daniel Rocha - RJ
[email protected]

Reply via email to