No, that's not how it is. Those isotopes are too pure, that's why they are expensive. In this case, they need much less processing, just enough to reduce the quantity of other isotopes than Ni62 and 64.
2012/1/21 John Milstone <john_sw_orla...@yahoo.com> > The trouble is, if only 64Ni is converted into Copper (and/or Iron?), and > the ash is 30% Copper, then wouldn't there have to be 30% 64Ni in the fuel? > Otherwise, where is the Copper coming from? > > And if Rossi can convert less than 1% 64Ni into at least 30%, and 64Ni is > going for $30,000/g, I think he found a much better money maker than > selling E-Cats. > > ------------------------------ > *From:* Daniel Rocha <danieldi...@gmail.com> > *To:* vortex-l@eskimo.com > *Sent:* Saturday, January 21, 2012 12:47 PM > *Subject:* Re: [Vo]:Ni-64 enrichment > > You are giving the number for a high purity isotope, like 99.99%. In other > thread, I was talking about an extremely dirty mixture of Ni62+Ni64 and a > bunch of other isotopes, no problem if it is 50% of other stuff. > > > -- Daniel Rocha - RJ danieldi...@gmail.com
