Here is a good example of someone who had their rights violated.

http://www.therecord.com/news/local/article/676150--man-shocked-by-arrest-after-daughter-draws-picture-of-gun-at-school

This guy had his rights violated in a number of different ways. He was not a 
criminal. Those that were involved in his abduction and sexual assault are the 
criminals.

If a random person abducts a person and strips them naked it is a sexual 
assault. If a policeman does it for NO VALID REASON when no crime has been 
committed, it is a sexual assault too. There is no difference whatsoever.


I would have not left the police station, and would have demanded to stay in 
the cell until everyone involved in my ABDUCTION was put in the cell instead.

If they can arrest an individual for no valid reason, then logically that 
individual should be able to request to stay in their cell until the issue is 
settled. 


Of course due to the fact that the courts in this nation are biased against the 
rights of individuals, the man would probably have gotten in more trouble. But 
it would have been worth it. Even if his family suffered, he lost his job, or 
if his family got broken apart, it would have been worth it.

If people do not stand up for their rights now, their children my end up in 
even worse situations in the future. What if his daughter one day got arrested 
for her daughter drawing an image of a vitamin supplement bottle (some are 
pushing for supplements to be regulated like drugs) such as Co Enzyme Q10? It 
could happen.

If people don't start PEACEFULLY and NON-VIOLENTLY start demanding their rights 
be protected then before long we will have no rights at all.

This is why I want space exploration to happen ASAP. I am hoping some colony 
worlds might be a bit saner than our planet is today.

However, you and others will probably say the school and police were justified, 
because it was in the name of public safety or something. Well, as far as I 
know, the 2nd amendment is still in the constitution. 


If Rossi's rights have been violated by any company then he needs to stand up 
for himself. By doing so, he will also be standing up for all future inventors. 





________________________________
 From: Jed Rothwell <[email protected]>
To: [email protected] 
Sent: Friday, February 24, 2012 8:38 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Test day in Greece time
 

noone noone <[email protected]> wrote:
 
If I did decide to take money (if I thought it was the best way to fight 
against the company using my technology), I would let it be known to the courts 
that any money awarded to me would be instantly used to try and stop the 
activities of the party that stole my technology.

1. You can't talk in court. Only your lawyer can, and it has to be about the 
case.

2. They don't care what you use the money for.


I would also not allow the offending company to obtain a license agreement.

It would not be up to you. You can't make up laws as you go along.

 
I would tell the Judge flat out that I would rather be publicly drawn, hung, 
and quartered rather than sign the piece of paper.

Judges don't care what you think. You don't have to actually sign the paper for 
this to go into effect.

Bear in mind also that these are civil suits. Jail sentences and the police 
play no role in them. In that sense it is quite different from stealing actual 
property.


The world you are describing is a nightmare world, in my opinion. It is a world 
that does not deserve cold fusion technology. I hope the reality of things are 
not as horrible as you portray.
>

This is the real world. You do not appear to know much about business, 
contracts and civil lawsuits. There are good reasons why we do things the way 
we do. You should not assume that laws and customs that have been in place for 
centuries are "horrible." Sometimes they are dysfunctional or obsolete, but we 
have to be careful about changing long-standing institutions. The conservative 
attitude is justified. In this case, the system has protect the interests of 
customers, and it has to promote technological progress. The system cannot take 
into account only the intellectual property rights of the inventor, ignoring 
all other factors.

If Defkalion succeeds I expect it will eventually benefit Rossi tremendously. 
He will make hundreds of millions of dollars. Left to his own devices, he would 
probably not make any money. I doubt that Defkalion has taken anything from 
him, but even if they have, he will probably get more from them than he could 
ever earn by himself.

Don't fret about any of this. It will probably work out well for everyone. 
There will be barrels of money. Enough for everyone. In 10 years the dispute 
will be forgotten.

- Jed

Reply via email to