In anyone's opinion (especially Jed), and in order of "convincingness" for an investor that wants to invest, which should be the most convincing Rossi tests (include the date to reduce confusion)?
Also, are there any competent scientists who have *carefully* looked at any Defkalion tests and put the weight of their reputation behind it? Christos Stremmenos? What I mean by carefully is did they check every wire and work closely with the calibration? I suppose no one really knows but what is the best answer to this? On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 6:00 PM, Jed Rothwell <[email protected]> wrote: > I meant to say Rossi DOES NOT care about credibility. > > Here is an astounding statement from Krivit: > > How did highly educated professionals in the scientific community not > recognize the multiple contradictions in the Rossi story? How did they not > see the scientific failure of Rossi's claim? > > Is there any person familiar with Rossi who does not recognize "the multiple > contradictions in the Rossi story"?!? Who the hell is Kivit talking about? I > and other have compiled lists of contradictory technical statements made by > Rossi. There is such a flood of these, I can't keep up with them. I would > not try to keep up with his contradictory assertions about his personal > business. Krivit seems to think that he alone sees this, and the rest of us > are blind to it. This is like looking at Niagara falls and thinking you are > the only person who notices all that water and everyone else is oblivious to > it. > > Fortunately, these "multiple contradictions" have no bearing on the > scientific success or failure of the claim. That can only be established > with reference to instrument readings, palpable heat, physical laws and > other objective evidence. Despite the poor quality of Rossi's tests, they > have proved beyond doubt that the claims are true. Rossi's personality and > his contradictory claims about his business cannot affect this conclusion. > > - Jed >
