________________________________
Von: David Roberson <dlrober...@aol.com>
An: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Gesendet: 17:57 Montag, 26.März 2012
Betreff: Re: [Vo]:nanoparticles in LENR
>Interesting information Xavier. The high Q nature of the resonances suggests
>that the circulating plasmon currents may not be subject to significant
>resistive losses. Is it possible that these currents are flowing within a
>super conductive structure? I would expect ...
Dave, this might be a bit off-topic, but then it is not.
Look at the Focardi-Piantelly et al paper:
"Surface Analysis of hydrogen loaded nickel alloys"
(google that -> first hit pdf)
The specimen:
...a cylindrical rod made by a nickel alloy (NiCrFeMn 7.6-20.6-70.4-1.4) with
length 9.0
cm. ...
They did not specify the diameter, but from the drawing I estimate it to 5mm.
So defintitely not something 'nano'.
This is not really a sort of experiment a genius would design.
Anyway.
If the analysis is correct, there is
a) a gradient along the rod
b) there are -ahem- transmutations
...In contrast, the elemental analysis of the sample rod (Fig. 7) are very
different from the blank rod analysis, and they are very different from one
region to the next along the sample.
...
I wonder how this fits into Your- or anyone's theoretical framework.
'Nano' sort of looks like a distraction.
This comes from the optimization of COP at any cost by the pathological
commercializers, even that of not recognizing the nature of the effect, which
often has a tiny voice. One must have the ears to listen to them, my inner poet
says.
Maybe Axil has an idea.
I personally am getting more and more cautious.
The spectrum goes from harmless (Rossi) to dangerous (LeClair).
I am afraid to say that this is sort of a technology, which needs solid
foundation in theory.
AND: This is different from 'fear of speed' in trains in the 19th century and
other misguided analogies.
regards
Guenter
