Why not use a carbon dioxide laser?
At 04:05 PM 4/5/2012, Daniel Rocha wrote: >The problem would be the output. The low energy >tail would have also a very low power. I think a >specialized equipment for that band is required... > -----Original Message----- From: Abd ul-Rahman Lomax <a...@lomaxdesign.com> To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com>; vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com> Sent: Thu, Apr 5, 2012 7:17 pm Subject: Re: [Vo]:Stimulation of LENR using dual lasers, creative engineering needed At 04:05 PM 4/5/2012, Daniel Rocha wrote: >The problem would be the output. The low energy >tail would have also a very low power. I think a >specialized equipment for that band is required... > >2012/4/5 Jones Beene <jone...@pacbell.net> > >Hey Daniel instead of straight wide spectrum >low IR - why not add a special filter to a tuned >resistance heater electrode to get some kind of >pseudo coherence? Here is a pretty steep spike at 2 THz: Yeah, I think Daniel is right. This is why dual laser stimulation is being used. It's relatively cheap. It's also low yield, but probably not as low as relying on a thermal source with a filter. And it's coherent, which might be necessary. I may suggest using a non-laser diode plus a tunable laser to generate the frequencies, to see if coherence is necessary.... Any ideas?
