At 09:30 PM 4/5/2012, Daniel Rocha wrote:
The idea was doing something cheap, right?
Yes. Cheap carbon dioxide laser? If we could get direct stimulation in the range of 8 - 22 ThZ, great! That would replace the two visible light lasers. However, I'm not clear if the far infrared would penetrate the windows and electrolyte.
2012/4/5 <<mailto:fznidar...@aol.com>fznidar...@aol.com> Why not use a carbon dioxide laser? At 04:05 PM 4/5/2012, Daniel Rocha wrote: >The problem would be the output. The low energy >tail would have also a very low power. I think a >specialized equipment for that band is required...
