The basic problem that Mills has had is in producing an attractive COP in a commercial package. He probably has achieved this with CUHT as described on the current website. Robin appears to seek the fusion path with a H[1/127] pseudo-neutron. While Mills has reported spectroscopic evidence of H[1/16] hydrinos, such are rare by the methods mills has used. It is a new world, largely unexplored.
Mike Carrell -----Original Message----- From: mix...@bigpond.com [mailto:mix...@bigpond.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2012 1:21 AM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: Re: [Vo]:Mills Hyrdrino project (was :about Triumph Management (and LENR)) In reply to Jojo Jaro's message of Wed, 6 Jun 2012 12:46:44 +0800: Hi Jojo, [snip] >Quite honestly, Mills has had decades and considerably more than >$100,000 that you estimate, to bring his Hydrino Theory reactor to >fruition without apparent success. No insult or ridicule intended, >but what makes you think that you can build a reactor based on his >theory that will outperform what he has produced so far, when the "maestro" himself has been unsuccessful? > >Please do not take this post as a snide remark to ridicule or to >insult. I guenuinely want to know. [snip] 1) Mills is not interested in fusion reactions. 2) By concentrating solely on Hydrino reactions Mills is constantly having trouble achieving an acceptable COP. 3) Fusion reactions deliver on average about 1 thousand to 10 thousand times more energy/Hydrino than hydrino reactions themselves, consequently an acceptable COP should not be a problem. 4) I have potentially come up with a way of bypassing the catalysis steps he requires. It is these catalysis steps that prevent him from achieving very large energy output/Hydrino. 5) I would produce mostly severely shrunken Hydrinos, and very rapidly, leading to almost instantaneous fusion (micro to milliseconds). 6) As a consequence, the power output is a simple function of Hydrino production rate and that in turn is simply a matter or regulating an electrical current. (In fact the device shares some aspects of an old electronic vacuum tube, which is why it can be so readily controlled over a wide range of power outputs). 7) I would prefer to use the p-B11 reaction if that proves possible, because it is very clean in a nuclear sense. 8) There is sufficient Boron in the oceans to last us for many millions of years. Regards, Robin van Spaandonk http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html ________________________________________________________________________ This Email has been scanned for all viruses by Medford Leas I.T. Department.
