Have you come up with a way to produce these hydrinos cheaply (in terms of
energy.)?
It seems to me that the first step is to prove your theory with a relatively
cheap "Hydrino Generator". I guess once you are able to create copious
amounts of hydrinos, it would be a simple thing to produce power, whether
there is actual Fusion or not; did I understand you correctly?
Jojo
----- Original Message -----
From: <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2012 1:20 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Mills Hyrdrino project (was :about Triumph Management (and
LENR))
In reply to Jojo Jaro's message of Wed, 6 Jun 2012 12:46:44 +0800:
Hi Jojo,
[snip]
Quite honestly, Mills has had decades and considerably more than $100,000
that you estimate, to bring his Hydrino Theory reactor to fruition without
apparent success. No insult or ridicule intended, but what makes you
think
that you can build a reactor based on his theory that will outperform what
he has produced so far, when the "maestro" himself has been unsuccessful?
Please do not take this post as a snide remark to ridicule or to insult. I
guenuinely want to know.
[snip]
1) Mills is not interested in fusion reactions.
2) By concentrating solely on Hydrino reactions Mills is constantly having
trouble achieving an acceptable COP.
3) Fusion reactions deliver on average about 1 thousand to 10 thousand times
more energy/Hydrino than hydrino reactions themselves, consequently an
acceptable COP should not be a problem.
4) I have potentially come up with a way of bypassing the catalysis steps he
requires. It is these catalysis steps that prevent him from achieving very
large
energy output/Hydrino.
5) I would produce mostly severely shrunken Hydrinos, and very rapidly,
leading
to almost instantaneous fusion (micro to milliseconds).
6) As a consequence, the power output is a simple function of Hydrino
production
rate and that in turn is simply a matter or regulating an electrical
current.
(In fact the device shares some aspects of an old electronic vacuum tube,
which
is why it can be so readily controlled over a wide range of power outputs).
7) I would prefer to use the p-B11 reaction if that proves possible, because
it
is very clean in a nuclear sense.
8) There is sufficient Boron in the oceans to last us for many millions of
years.
Regards,
Robin van Spaandonk
http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html
