Robin, let me see if I got this right.
1. Your machine (proposed machine) will take H2 (Hydrogen Molecule) and
convert it to Hy2 (hydrino molecule.). Theoritically you can do this in
copious amounts with an output of energy.
2. Then, you take the Hy2 molecule and split it into Hy+ and Hy+ molecule.
This involves an input of 4000eV.
3. Then you fuse Hy+ with Hy+ to form a hydrino variant of Helium.
4. Then this hydrino variant of He becomes normal Helium with an input of
energy.
Did I get this right?
And all this results in a COP of 1000 - 2000?
I think the first step is to prove the existence of the Hydrino to begin
with. Do we have any conclusive proof that hydrinos exists?
Jojo
----- Original Message -----
From: <mix...@bigpond.com>
To: <vortex-l@eskimo.com>
Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2012 2:01 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Mills Hyrdrino project (was :about Triumph Management (and
LENR))
In reply to Jojo Jaro's message of Wed, 6 Jun 2012 13:40:47 +0800:
Hi,
[snip]
Have you come up with a way to produce these hydrinos cheaply (in terms of
energy.)?
It seems to me that the first step is to prove your theory with a
relatively
cheap "Hydrino Generator". I guess once you are able to create copious
amounts of hydrinos, it would be a simple thing to produce power, whether
there is actual Fusion or not; did I understand you correctly?
All one and the same thing. Hydrinos are manufactured in the device itself,
and
fused on the spot.
However the great possible weakness is that I'm not sure how much energy it
will
cost to make them. At 100% production efficiency about 4000 eV / Hydrino =>
8
MeV fusion energy for a COP of 2000. However I have no idea what sort of
production efficiency I might achieve in practice (IOW I don't know how many
times I will have to spend 4000 eV to produce 1 Hydrino).
Though it may not be too bad, as there are few alternative routes available
that
might consume energy.
Despite the uncertainties, I think it's worth trying. The downside is a few
thousand down the drain if it doesn't work. The upside is billion/trillions
if
it does.
(The World spends over 4 trillion annually on energy).
(Besides the additional benefit of cheap & easy interplanetary travel.;)
Regards,
Robin van Spaandonk
http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html
