As far as I know, I am inventing the term Larmor Compensation. Larmor Radiation occurs whenever a charged particle is accelerated.A so-call "orbital" electron accelerates and completely decelerates in two directions every single time it completes some sort of loop around an atomic nucleus; therefore, it must be continuously supplied with new energy, presumably at the expense of the ever-forming and ever-reforming electromagnetic flux of the Quantum Vacuum. I am actually pursuing a US patent on an entirely new class of devices that would exploit this very-real fact of nature. Please contact me if you would like to be involved with the project. Scott Wm. Scott Smith
> Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2012 23:49:44 -0400 > Subject: Re: [Vo]:The missing half of the Law of CoE... > From: [email protected] > To: [email protected] > > The apparent lack of anti-matter in the universe is also conundrum > from the standpoint of CoE. > > harry > > On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 8:09 PM, Eric Walker <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 4:54 PM, MarkI-ZeroPoint <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > >> Hence, when someone adamantly relies on CoE, saying that such and such is > >> impossible since it would violate CoE, they are not a scientist in my mind. > > > > > > I don't know about the "not a scientist" part, but I personally have no > > profound attachment to CoE. :) Assume that CoE is understood today as: > > > > Eout - Ein = 0 > > > > What if, instead, it were really: > > > > Eout - Ein = k > > > > for very small k, or, more interestingly, > > > > Eout - Ein = f(t) > > > > for f(t) ~ 0 at this time. > > > > Scientists see fit to posit parallel universes and dark energy and so on, so > > I see no reason to conclude that the known universe is a closed system. > > Perhaps, every time there is a reaction that involves electromagnetic > > radiation, you get a little less out than goes in, and we just balance the > > books with neutrinos and other gimics that would make Enron proud. > > > > My earlier comments were a futile attempt to understand how a LENR reaction > > involving titanium could be endothermic. It's probably not all that > > difficult, as it turns out, and my lack of understanding of thermodynamics > > was getting in the way. > > > > Eric > > >
