Fact is, that Mats Lewan's last article on CF/LENR in NyTeknik dates to 28-Feb-2012 http://www.nyteknik.se/tjanster/sok/
Here are his affiliations: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Matslewan on his personal blog there is one additional entry from 28-April: http://matslew.wordpress.com/2012/04/28/defkalion-posts-job-listing-for-21-professionals/ (My comment on this is, that a job-offer like this does not imply that a company is actually hiring. Maybe they just want to give the impression that they do. Bonus effect: It costs them exactly nothing, and they can scan the field.) Here he also states: ...At Ny Teknik, we’re following the development closely and we will come back with further reports as soon as there’s more confirmed data available... So I am factually WRONG that Lewan is not affiliated with NyTeknik anymore, and had to 'resign', and indeed he writes on a variety of issues there: http://www.nyteknik.se/ovrigt/redaktionen/mats_lewan/ So shame on me on this one. Fact is also, that NyTeknik is not publishing anything re CF/LENR since 28-Feb. Sorry, I could not find the reference anymore, that there have been some discussions inside NyTeknik re CF/LENR-reporting, so I should not make such claims just from memory. But zero reporting on a seemingly hot issue should make one think, right? Guenter ________________________________ Von: MarkI-ZeroPoint <zeropo...@charter.net> An: vortex-l@eskimo.com Gesendet: 0:36 Freitag, 13.Juli 2012 Betreff: RE: [Vo]:Rossi conspiracy, part Two I agree with Jed here… Guenter wrote: ----------- “Mats Lewan from Nyteknik had to resign because of what? Sloppy bullshitting. “Since the elimination of M.L. from Nyteknik staff, all LENR reporting stopped. Why? ------------- Guenter wrote these not as questions, but explicit statements as if they were fact… shame on you!!! Perhaps a web search of 'LENR Nyteknik'returned nothing, but a web search of Nyteknik and Lewans would have shown that he was still publishing articles as Jed so easily pointed out. This list certainly engages in plenty of speculation, but most people will write in such a way to make it clear its speculation. When it comes to speculations about a person (as opposed to science/technology), you dam well better make sure you state that it is speculation… or else do the necessary checking to make sure you have the facts behind you. -Mark From:Jed Rothwell [mailto:jedrothw...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, July 12, 2012 3:20 PM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: Re: [Vo]:Rossi conspiracy, part Two Guenter Wildgruber <gwildgru...@ymail.com> wrote: Wether Mats Lewan has the mental acuity to decode what is going on, is an open isue to me. I have no doubt he has sufficient mental acuity. Lewan could not make his case convincingly, and made some grave errors of judgement, as far as I can see. > >Correct me if I am wrong, on a factual basis. Errors of judgement are a matter of opinion. Your statements regarding matters of fact are wrong. Lewan is still writing there. His article are still on file. He has not retracted, and neither has Essen, Kullander or any of the others. Consider yourself corrected. People such as Essen know a great deal more about energy than you do, and much more about the Rossi device. So I expect they are right, and you are technically wrong about the claims, as well as factually wrong about Lewan's employment status. Unless you have specific information that Lewan is not longer writing for NyTeknik, you should not claim he has been fired. I think such unfounded rumors are inappropriate here. - Jed
