I agree with Mark,

People will not have to learn LENR, they will just replace/upgrade their
existing HVAC equipment with a device that happens to produce electricity
also and reduces their bill - no brainer.

Information access is much easier today with the internet and will aid in
the proliferation of the technology.

LENR requires less infrastructure than cell phones and there are already 6
billion of them in the world, all within the last 30 years or so.



On Saturday, July 21, 2012, Jed Rothwell wrote:

> MarkI-ZeroPoint <[email protected] <javascript:_e({}, 'cvml',
> '[email protected]');>> wrote:
>
>
>> I couldn’t disagree more…  seriously, hundreds or thousands of years?  **
>> **
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> Once the scientific community (both academic and corporate) realizes that
>> a whole new field of science is being born, they will dive in to understand
>> it and engineer it in ways we can’t even imagine . . .
>>
>
> Probably they will, but people do not think or learn any faster today than
> they did in the past. The pace of progress is no faster than it ever was.
> It is still governed mainly by funerals.
>
> The serious study of chemistry began around 1650. It did not reach
> fruition with chemical engineering until the late 19th century.
> Transmutation with cold fusion is still at the stage chemistry was when
> Robert Boyle published a book saying there are more than four elements,
> "The Skeptical Chemist" (1661):
>
> http://www.gutenberg.org/files/22914/22914-h/22914-h.htm
>
> People nowadays have the notion that technology, society and the world in
> general are changing at a faster pace than ever before. People who believe
> this have not read enough history. They do not realize how quickly things
> changed in earlier eras such as:
>
> England after colonization in America began;
>
> England during the industrial revolution;
>
> The U.S. from 1850 to 1870;
>
> Japan during the Meiji era.
>
> People such as my parents or Julian Schwinger, who lived from around 1914
> to around 2000, saw much more fundamental change than people born in the
> mid-20th century have seen. That is why they were more open minded and
> willing to believe in claims such as cold fusion. The present era is one of
> technical and scientific stagnation, not progress.
>
> Even popular culture such as fashion and music have stagnated. See: "You
> Say You Want a Devolution" (great title!):
>
> http://www.vanityfair.com/style/2012/01/prisoners-of-style-201201
>
> - Jed
>
>

Reply via email to