If the bible is suppose to be as good or even better than science it should not use such vague language.
harry On Sat, Aug 4, 2012 at 5:48 PM, Jojo Jaro <[email protected]> wrote: > Well, this is just one case wherein science has verified the accounts of the > Bible. There are many many many instances of this. The Bible is not a > book of Science but when it does make a statement about science, it has been > found to be true. > > Did you know that the Bible says the Earth is round, thousands of years > before man discovered it is round. It is the only ancient book of its time > that has made this statement. > > Did you know that the Bible says that the Sun has a "Circuit" - a pathway in > which it follows, thousands of years before we discovered that the sun does > indeed follow a pathway around the center of the Milky Way. > > There are many many many facts like this that the Bible categorically > states; and science finally catches up with the Bible and verifies it. > > There is not a single fact in the Bible that Science has contradicted. I > said "Science", the real science; not the "Bad Science", not the politically > driven science we know today. > > > > Jojo > > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Harry Veeder" <[email protected]> > To: <[email protected]> > Sent: Sunday, August 05, 2012 3:46 AM > Subject: Re: [Vo]:Darwinian Evolution (Was Tritium in Ni-H LENR) > > >> Parts of the Earth may have undergone rapid catastrophic flooding >> thousands of years ago, but you don't have to believe in the bible to >> argue the case. >> The theory that some geological features formed very quickly instead >> of gradually is compatible with Earth being billions of years old. >> Harry >> >> >
