*did the "reaction" produce heat under those circumstances?* Unknown.
The only instance of heat production that I have run across is during the “anomaly”. A coil wrapped according to the original Papp specs in the patent, is heated as the noble gases are teleported out of the cylinder ending in a vacuum in the cylinder. After the Pop is initiated, the coil is moved away from the portion of the cylinder that supports the gas. Only the copper of the coil is heated and not the plastic spool that supports the copper wire. This heat is produced even when the coil is grounded. See these YouTubes for specifics: Part 1 http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=Z0IPWmm7GDc Part 2 http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=jlgiwB8V4sc Cheers: Axil On Sun, Aug 12, 2012 at 4:43 PM, Harry Veeder <[email protected]> wrote: > did the "reaction" produce heat under those circumstances? > > Harry > > On Sun, Aug 12, 2012 at 4:03 PM, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote: > > In a video of the Papp engine that was fitted with a transparent cylinder > > sleeve, no coil was used so that the reaction could be seen. The piston > > sometimes moved but not with any force. > > > > > > > > Cheers: Axil > > > > On Sun, Aug 12, 2012 at 3:55 PM, Harry Veeder <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> > >> does that mean the piston does not move? > >> Harry > >> > >> On Sun, Aug 12, 2012 at 2:53 PM, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > Removing the coil disables the Papp reaction. > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > Cheers: Axil > >> > > >> > > >> > On Sun, Aug 12, 2012 at 12:32 PM, Harry Veeder <[email protected]> > >> > wrote: > >> >> > >> >> sorry if this has already been discussed, but does the papp engine > >> >> heat up if the coil is removed? > >> >> > >> >> Harry > >> >> > >> >> On Sat, Aug 11, 2012 at 8:37 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> > In reply to Axil Axil's message of Fri, 10 Aug 2012 20:34:44 > -0400: > >> >> > Hi, > >> >> > [snip] > >> >> >>(*C12* is C12 in an excited state - it has an additional 15.96 MeV > >> >> >> that > >> >> >> it* > >> >> >>* * > >> >> >> > >> >> >>*desperately wants to get rid of)* > >> >> >> > >> >> >>This is only true when the coulomb barrier is up at full strength. > >> >> >> But > >> >> >> when > >> >> >>the coulomb barrier is completely down, protons behave like > neutrons. > >> >> >> They > >> >> >>can exit the nucleus with no energy penalty. > >> >> >> > >> >> >>I explain this in the thread “the bumpy road.” > >> >> > > >> >> > If there were no energy penalty to protons (or neutrons) leaving > the > >> >> > nucleus, > >> >> > then the nucleus would fall apart. This doesn't happen. > >> >> > > >> >> > BTW the Coulomb barrier is partially a misnomer. It's a Coulomb > >> >> > barrier > >> >> > for > >> >> > positively charged particles trying to enter the nucleus, but > >> >> > actually a > >> >> > nuclear > >> >> > binding force barrier for particles trying to leave the nucleus. > >> >> > > >> >> > Regards, > >> >> > > >> >> > Robin van Spaandonk > >> >> > > >> >> > http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html > >> >> > > >> >> > >> > > >> > > > >
