The super-atom produced as a large collection of coherent and entangled
particles can completely lowers the Coulomb barrier. This is how atomic
clustering fits into the LENR+ process.

see

*www.iscmns.org/work10/VysotskiiVapplicatio.ppt*
**
**
*Cheers:     Axil*

**



On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 2:04 AM, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote:

> According to this paper, clusters of atoms drop the coulomb barrier. The
> paper you reference  in thiis post sites this as a cause of coulomb
> barrier lowering.
> Cheers:   Axil
>
>
>
> http://newenergytimes.com/v2/conferences/2012/ICCF17/ICCF-17-Vysotskii-Features-and-Giant-Acceleration.pdf
>
>
> On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 6:51 PM, Jeff Berkowitz <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> I read it too. The work has also been published in an influential
>> peer-reviewed journal, JETP (Journal of Experimental and Theoretical
>> Physics), a leading Russian journal also published in English:
>>
>> http://www.springerlink.com/content/rup025083t105q83/
>>
>> It is hard to know what to make of this. It says the Coulomb barrier
>> drops away to low levels under conditions we can in principle control. If
>> true, that would be ... big.
>>
>> Wouldn't it be amusing if the "uncontrolled variable" that accounts for
>> variation of results over the last 23 years turned out to be the RFI
>> background in the vicinity of the experiment?
>>
>> Jeff
>>
>> On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 1:08 PM, Alan Fletcher <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> > From: "Jeff Berkowitz" <[email protected]>
>>> > Sent: Saturday, August 18, 2012 10:08:15 PM
>>> > Subject: [Vo]:Analysis of W-L theory as applicable to Rossi device
>>> > If you open this link:
>>> >
>>> http://newenergytimes.com/v2/conferences/2012/ICCF17/ICCF-17-Vysotskii-Stimulated-LENR-Paper.pdf
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > It turns out that the PDF contains three separate and unrelated LENR
>>> > papers stuck together end to end.
>>>
>>> The third paper is worth reading ... Harmonic oscillator explains the
>>> peaks in Hagelstein/Letts/Craven laser beat frequencies.
>>>
>>> Ni+p => Cu+v reaction rate goes from 10^-1000 to 10^-4
>>>
>>> Says it explains Rossi-Focardi ... except that they don't use a RF
>>> stimulator (any more?)
>>>
>>>
>>
>

Reply via email to