I agree.  I also believe this army is wearing blue uniforms.  These are all
blue-shifted high energy particle/waves working together as a concentrated
and cohesive force at the location of the battle (horizon).  Nothing can
stop them, neither matter or energy as they consume both.

You might be able to contain this army in some type of magnetic field or
inertial confinement, but they are elusive by nature.  They magnify the
Uncertainty Principle many times over.  Best though to keep them isolated
as best you can.

On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 12:48 PM, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote:

> If you can think of the coulomb barrier as a soldier, a very good and
> strong one, this hero, can defeat any individual soldier of the opposing
> army. Even if the opposing army attacks our hero one fighter at a time the
> hero can resist the attack since the attack is uncoordinated.
>
> But when the opposing army gets its act together and acts a cohesive unit
> the hero is overcome by the combined and additive strength of the combined
> and coordinated action of the army.
> The bigger that the coordinated army is, the more soundly that the hero is
> defeated.
>
> Since electrons and protons are  waves also see:
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Constructive_interference
>
>
> Cheers:    Axil
>
>
> On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 11:01 AM, David Roberson <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>> Axil, perhaps there is something going on that results in the lowering of
>> the barrier.  I have to ask where the additional energy comes from to
>> satisfy the actual energy needed?  If it is taken from other particles that
>> might make sense, otherwise it sounds like a free lunch.
>>
>> Dave
>>  -----Original Message-----
>> From: Axil Axil <[email protected]>
>> To: vortex-l <[email protected]>
>> Sent: Mon, Aug 20, 2012 2:20 am
>> Subject: Re: [Vo]:Analysis of W-L theory as applicable to Rossi device --
>> Third paper
>>
>>  The super-atom produced as a large collection of coherent and entangled
>> particles can completely lowers the Coulomb barrier. This is how atomic
>> clustering fits into the LENR+ process.
>>
>> see
>>
>> *www.iscmns.org/work10/VysotskiiVapplicatio.ppt*
>> **
>> **
>> *Cheers:     Axil*
>>  **
>>
>>
>>
>>  On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 2:04 AM, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>>  According to this paper, clusters of atoms drop the coulomb barrier.
>>> The paper you reference  in thiis post sites this as a cause of coulomb
>>> barrier lowering.
>>> Cheers:   Axil
>>>
>>>
>>> http://newenergytimes.com/v2/conferences/2012/ICCF17/ICCF-17-Vysotskii-Features-and-Giant-Acceleration.pdf
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 6:51 PM, Jeff Berkowitz <[email protected]>wrote:
>>>
>>>> I read it too. The work has also been published in an influential
>>>> peer-reviewed journal, JETP (Journal of Experimental and Theoretical
>>>> Physics), a leading Russian journal also published in English:
>>>>
>>>>  http://www.springerlink.com/content/rup025083t105q83/
>>>>
>>>>  It is hard to know what to make of this. It says the Coulomb barrier
>>>> drops away to low levels under conditions we can in principle control. If
>>>> true, that would be ... big.
>>>>
>>>>  Wouldn't it be amusing if the "uncontrolled variable" that accounts
>>>> for variation of results over the last 23 years turned out to be the RFI
>>>> background in the vicinity of the experiment?
>>>>
>>>>  Jeff
>>>>
>>>> On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 1:08 PM, Alan Fletcher <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> > From: "Jeff Berkowitz" <[email protected]>
>>>>> > Sent: Saturday, August 18, 2012 10:08:15 PM
>>>>> > Subject: [Vo]:Analysis of W-L theory as applicable to Rossi device
>>>>> > If you open this link:
>>>>> >
>>>>> http://newenergytimes.com/v2/conferences/2012/ICCF17/ICCF-17-Vysotskii-Stimulated-LENR-Paper.pdf
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> > It turns out that the PDF contains three separate and unrelated LENR
>>>>> > papers stuck together end to end.
>>>>>
>>>>> The third paper is worth reading ... Harmonic oscillator explains the
>>>>> peaks in Hagelstein/Letts/Craven laser beat frequencies.
>>>>>
>>>>> Ni+p => Cu+v reaction rate goes from 10^-1000 to 10^-4
>>>>>
>>>>> Says it explains Rossi-Focardi ... except that they don't use a RF
>>>>> stimulator (any more?)
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>

Reply via email to