You are absolutely correct. I am not an experienced user and I will not push this further ayway :-)
Sverre Haslund 2012/9/16 Abd ul-Rahman Lomax <[email protected]> > At 05:03 AM 9/15/2012, Sverre Haslund wrote: > >> Hmm.. my edit about SGS certificate has held for 10 minutes. < >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/**Energy_Catalyzer#Commercial_**plans<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Energy_Catalyzer#Commercial_plans> >> >http://en.wikipedia.org/**wiki/Energy_Catalyzer#**Commercial_plansÂ<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Energy_Catalyzer#Commercial_plans%C3%82> >> >> Sverre Haslund >> > > Eek. > > Page history shows revert warring See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/** > Wikipedia:3RR#The_three-**revert_rule<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:3RR#The_three-revert_rule> > . > > It's a bit tedious to figure this out exactly, but it looks like: > > TheNextFuture, 5RR. I predict a block any day for TheNextFuture. This is > an SPA, likely the sock of a banned user. New users don't file AfDs in > their first few edits. Once upon a time, there would have been somone all > over TheNextFuture, like me. > > Insilvis, 5RR. block for revert warring likely. "Good reverts" is > generally not a defense. > > Shaslund, 2RR. SPA, only five edits total, one edit in 2009 to Blacklight > Power. Block not likely unless Sverre pushes this further. Shaslund is > clearly not an experienced user, doesn't use edit summaries (very important > when reverting, to explain). > > Given the insistent activity from editors (on both sides) clearly not > following WP policy and guidelines, I predict that the article will be > protected from editing. Semiprotection might not be adequate here. With > less than this, and really only one revert warrior, Cold fusion was > full-protected. All it takes is someone who knows how to file an RfPP. > > In any case, Shaslund's first attempt to insert the material lasted 53 > minutes before being reverted by Insilvis. The second lasted 24 minutes. A > third might get him blocked, a fourth would very, very likely result in a > block if it's within 24 hours. > > The 3RR rule is a "bright line," one must have a critical interest to > cross it and survive, and an admin might block first and ask questions > later. Something like illegal content or libel. I once survived a 3RR > violation block because I was reverting blatant sock puppets. First entry > in my block log.... reversed as soon as the admin took a closer look. I was > new. > > Insilivis might make that claim here, TheNextFuture is so obvious. >
