Guys, Just a short update on my research:
Guys, I am not a Nuclear Engineer so I fall short there but please accept me for who I am. 1) My research tells me LENR is basically atomic Hydrogen collapsing to a Neutrino, which can then bombard its surroundings, including other hydrogen, triggering +/- Beta Decays, Fission and Fusion 2) I scaled the neutrino mass up to that of a weakly interacting massive particle (mass varies widely in the universe) and I have successfully fit it to an orbital model for 3 recent large sinkholes/seismic & hurricanes/storms that approached them (Sandy, Rafael, Isaac). The energetic particles orbit through and around the Earth in a decaying orbit. The Beta Decay triggered as the particle orbits into the Earth creates the sinkhole and also can trigger seismic and earthquakes as it weakens the Earth all the way through its orbit. Where the massive particle orbits out of the Earth you can get a severe low pressure system or just a rainbow/thunderstorm. In a hurricane, as the orbit decays the low pressure system approaches the sinkhole. In a severe thunderstorm the kepler elliptical orbit of the particle above ground can form a rainbow from the ice crystals/cold it creates in its path. 3) When I realized that comets many times proceeded earthquakes and extreme cooling events on Earth I have studied the behavior and emissions of Comets and have determined the nuclei of comets are nothing more than clumped dark matter. NASA believes they are ice balls and they are wrong. Comet Lovejoy recently orbited THROUGH the sun, no ordinary matter can do that. The million mile long tail of comets is the LENR engine creating e=mc2 from any matter pulled near the nuclei. 4) As we currently have two Comets on a close approach to the Sun, the Earth may be in trouble if the Nuclei breakup, which is very common. If these Nuclei pass near or through the Earth they can trigger severe conditions, worse than I want to mention, including ice ages according to my model. Although I have never been a crop circle fan, circles have been predicting an "event" since 2008, which will begin at the end of 2012. My research is telling me that a comet is nothing but massive balls of "uncertainty" clumped together and we now have TWO coming between us and the sun. Crop circles show 3, maybe one will split up or another is lurking. I think we are in trouble. Godspeed. Stewart darkmattersalot.com On Sat, Nov 10, 2012 at 2:32 PM, Jones Beene <[email protected]> wrote: > As far as I know - there are no, zero, nada, high-gain Ni-H experiments > in the multi-watt power range, lasting for months other than anecdote – at > least none with independent validation.**** > > ** ** > > Matter of fact, I can think of no published and replicated high-gain > multi-watt Ni-H experiment lasting even a week.**** > > ** ** > > My contention stands - that when the criterion is for a month continuous > operation in the multi-watt range, there is adequate evidence for low-gain > only, and zero reliable evidence for long-term high gain. **** > > ** ** > > Jones**** > > ** ** > > *From:* Jed Rothwell **** > > *Subject:* Re: [Vo]:The new normal**** > > ** ** > > Jones Beene <[email protected]> wrote:**** > > **** > > Get some caffeine, or someone will think you have lost the > encyclopedia… cough, cough… after all, this is only the longest running (by > far) validated experiment in the entire field. Fully replicated by NASA at > two locations with same results. COP about 1.5.**** > > **** > > *lenr-canr.org/acrobat/GernertNnascenthyd.pdf***** > > ** ** > > You misunderstand. I did not say "there are no low-gain Ni-H experiments." > I said there are many other high-gain Ni-H experiments, and many > infinite-gain ones with no input, so the effect is not limited to a low > gain. If you believe any evidence for any Ni-H experiment, then you must > also believe that "gain" does not exist. The evidence proves that as surely > as it proves the effect is real.**** > > ** ** > > That applies to Pd-D cold fusion as well. There are many "low gain" > experiments. More than the high-gain ones. But there are enough high-gain > ones and heat after death ones to prove that the concept of a COP has no > application whatever to cold fusion.**** > > ** ** > > The input power -- when present -- is only needed to form and maintain the > nuclear-active environment. The highly loaded metal, in other words. The > material is dynamically formed in some experiments, like one of these > "moonwalk" inflated game sets for kids. As soon as you turn off the blower > power the moonwalk starts to collapse. When you turn off electrolysis in a > Pd-D experiment, the cathode starts to de-gas. Then the effect peters out. > Sometimes this takes a few minutes. Sometimes it takes hours or days. > That's called "heat after death." It is not profound. Not even very > interesting. That's all there is to it. It does prove, however, that input > does not "produce" output in any sense, so the term COP (coefficient of > production) is a misnomer in this case.**** > > ** ** > > - Jed**** > > ** ** >
