Just call it dark matter/energy formation and we will all agree, it is available through weak interactions - gravity and beta decay. It loves all forms of matter. We are just the 4.7% frosting.
Stewart Darkmattersalot.com On Friday, November 16, 2012, Axil Axil wrote: > Plasmoid formation does not necessarily need water as a formation medium. > It sounds like you used air as the medium. > > The plasmoid can take on a number of forms. > > Your experiment falls into the area of the EV. > > See this document for a breakout of the many faces of plasmoid phenomena: > > > http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&frm=1&source=web&cd=8&cad=rja&ved=0CFgQFjAH&url=http%3A%2F%2Ffreeenergynews.com%2FDirectory%2FElectrolysis%2FMoray_King%2FMorayKingTalk2ForNPA.ppt&ei=JJKmUNSCJObI0AGvyYH4Cw&usg=AFQjCNGPEXf2WI68OdtvbrZ_Hz3VC4TQ4A > > Specifically see “plasmoid transmutation” a describing the results of your > experiment most closely. > > By the way, I seem to be a fellow traveler intellectually with Moray B. > King in many regards and not have known it until I saw this reference. But > I still draw separation between zero-point-energy and coulomb barrier > lowering. I will need to look into King’s thinking more closely. > > In other words, Zero point energy produces a subset of the LENR activity. > Coulomb barrier lowering also produces many instances of LENR activity. But > the common cause is coherent charge organization and its quantum mechanical > consequence. > > > Cheers: Axil > On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 1:03 PM, Michael Foster <[email protected]> wrote: > > Years ago, I did similar carbon arc experiments because I thought this > would be the best way to demonstrate the possibility of nuclear > transmutation by other than conventional means. I used spectroscopic grade > carbon rods as well. Far more iron was created than could be accounted for > by contamination. The only difference was that no water was used and there > was probably more iron made as a percentage of the original carbon weight. > I had a powerful magnet near the arc, so possibly the iron was removed > before it could revert. That hypothesis is rather half baked but maybe a > magnet should be used in the underwater version to see if the results are > different. > > Since there was no water, I think the idea of this being the results of > cavitation doesn't seem valid. > > M. > > --- On *Thu, 11/15/12, Jed Rothwell <[email protected]>* wrote: > > > From: Jed Rothwell <[email protected]> > Subject: [Vo]:Papers about carbon arc experiments > To: [email protected] > Date: Thursday, November 15, 2012, 1:11 PM > > > I uploaded two papers about carbon arc experiments: > > Singh, M., et al., *Verification of the George Oshawa Experiment for > Anomalous Production of Iron From Carbon Arc in Water*. Fusion Technol., > 1994. *26*: p. 266. > > http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/SinghMverificati.pdf > > > Sundaresan, R. and J. Bockris, *Anomalous Reactions During Arcing Between > Carbon Rods in Water*. Fusion Technol., 1994. *26*: p. 261. > > http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/Sundaresananomalousr.pdf > > > The quality of these scans is not good. By the time I realized there was a > problem I had already thrown out the original paper. Sorry about that. > > Because there are OCR errors in the text that may copy the corrected > abstracts here. This is from the LENR-CANR index system, which you see when > you click on the plus sign: > > Author Singh, M. > > Co-authors Saksena, M. D., Dixit, V. S., Kartha, V. B. > > Title Verification of the George Oshawa Experiment for Anomalous > Production of Iron From Carbon Arc in Water > > Publisher Fusion Technol. > > Date Uploaded 2012-11-15 > > Abstract A direct current arc was run between ultrapure graphite > electrodes dipped in ultrapure water for 1 to 20 h, The graphite residue > collected at the bottom of the water trough was analyzed for iron content > by a conventional spectrographic method, It was found, in the first few > experiments, that the iron content in the graphite residue was fairly high, > depending on the duration of the arcing, The experiment was repeated > initially six times, and the results showed large variations in > iron content (50 to 2000 parts per million (ppm)) in the carbon residue, In > the second series of experiments, which were done with the water trough > fully covered, the amount of iron in the carbon residue decreased > significantly (20 to 100 ppm), Here also there were large variations in the > iron concentration in the residue, although the experiments were performed > under identical conditions, Whether iron is really being synthesized > through transmutation from carbon and oxygen as suggested by George Oshawa > or is getting concentrated to different degrees through some other > phenomenon is not currently clear, The iron in the carbon residue was also > analyzed mass spectrometrically for the abundance of its various isotopes, > and the > >
