In reply to  Michael Foster's message of Fri, 16 Nov 2012 10:03:08 -0800 (PST):
Hi,
[snip]
>Years ago, I did similar carbon arc experiments because I thought this would 
>be the best way to demonstrate the possibility of nuclear transmutation by 
>other than conventional means. I used spectroscopic grade carbon rods as well. 
>Far more iron was created than could be accounted for by contamination. The 
>only difference was that no water was used and there was probably more iron 
>made as a percentage of the original carbon weight. I had a powerful magnet 
>near the arc, so possibly the iron was removed before it could revert. That 
>hypothesis is rather half baked but maybe a magnet should be used in the 
>underwater version to see if the results are different. 
>Since there was no water, I think the idea of this being the results of 
>cavitation doesn't seem valid.
>M.

I don't know whether or not it's relevant but

5 x 12C => 56Fe + 4 x H + 31.4 MeV

Regards,

Robin van Spaandonk

http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html

Reply via email to