However a U.S. nickel is 75/25 copper/nickel. It might be possible to
figure out the speed of sound using information in this thread:

http://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=277330

I'll look at it later.

Jeff


On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 1:38 PM, Jeff Berkowitz <[email protected]> wrote:

> Interesting. A U.S. nickel is 1.95mm thick.
>
>
> On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 1:21 PM, James Bowery <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> It's hard to know where to begin here but let me just say this that given the
>> speed of sound in 
>> nickel<http://www.olympus-ims.com/en/ndt-tutorials/thickness-gage/appendices-velocities/>
>> :
>>
>> 5630m/s
>>
>> and 430kHz:
>>
>> 5630m/s;430kHz?mm
>>
>> ([5630 * meter] / second) * (430 * [kilo*hertz])^-1 ? milli*meter
>> = 2.0838194 mm
>>
>> In other words, a 2mm electrode should exhibit resonance at ~430kHz.
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 2:47 PM, Jones Beene <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>>  On the contrary James, at least two of us did look closely at this
>>> possibility [electrode acoustics]. ****
>>>
>>> ** **
>>>
>>> My associate went to trouble to find and download a mpeg sound file of a
>>> bicycle bell of the same general size as Davey’s, and plugged it into a
>>> program for this kind of analysis – in fact it is dedicated bell analysis
>>> software that has proved very accurate for electrodes in the past. The
>>> natural acoustic of this hemisphere are nowhere close.****
>>>
>>> ** **
>>>
>>> The main freq is 4,445.5 Hz, with some sub harmonics, the lowest being
>>> around 521/545 Hz, but those are so faint as to be discarded. Higher
>>> harmonics are barely above noise.****
>>>
>>> ** **
>>>
>>> Thus, since the acoustics of the electrodes were off by two orders of
>>> magnitude over the signature sound, we did not think that electrode
>>> acoustics were in any way relevant as an alternative explanation, or
>>> otherwise worth pursuing.****
>>>
>>> ** **
>>>
>>> Jones****
>>>
>>> ** **
>>>
>>> ** **
>>>
>>> *From:* James Bowery ****
>>>
>>> ** **
>>>
>>> As I previously 
>>> advised<http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg73144.html>
>>> :****
>>>
>>> ** **
>>>
>>> "Look at the acoustics of the electrodes."****
>>>
>>> ** **
>>>
>>> Since this advice seemed to make no impact on the discourse here at
>>> vortex-l, let me expand:****
>>>
>>> ** **
>>>
>>> Acoustic resonance in the metallic electrodes does have a reasonable
>>> chance of bearing directly on the creation of the "nuclear active
>>> environment" hypothesized to exist.  I don't think I need to expland on
>>> list the possibilities here.****
>>>
>>> ** **
>>>
>>> Moreover, if one looks at the speed of sound in metals, the "430kHz LENR
>>> signature" regime corresponds to the thickness of the cathodes frequently
>>> reported as exhibiting the phenomena.****
>>>
>>> ** **
>>>
>>> Need I say more?**
>>>
>>> ** **
>>>
>>
>>
>

Reply via email to