JoJo, Always the charmer...
On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 12:25 PM, Jojo Jaro <jth...@hotmail.com> wrote: > ** > Ha Ha Ha, you give yourself too much credit as if the world revolves > around you. I respond to your posts like I respond to those cow > decorations I find in my farm, as there is no difference between the two. > LOL ... > > All that hot air is inflating your bubble head. Tell you what, let make > use of all that hot air from your mouth and patent a stirling engine to > free us of arab oil, shall we? > > Jojo > > > > PS. thanks for the entertainment though. > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > *From:* Daniel Rocha <danieldi...@gmail.com> > *To:* John Milstone <vortex-l@eskimo.com> > *Sent:* Wednesday, December 05, 2012 12:48 AM > *Subject:* Re: [Vo]:How bad is this news? Jed Rothwell > > Oh, damn! I talk about a possible correlation between bible fanatics and > AGW denial and guess who appears 1 minute later! HA! > > > 2012/12/4 Jojo Jaro <jth...@hotmail.com> > >> NO no no ... please don't drop off from this discussion. I'm thoroughly >> enjoying this discussion. >> >> Robert L and Robert M, please continue this discussion and continue >> putting out facts. It's about time somebody knowledgeable took the time to >> correct all these anthropic global warming crap that keeps on cropping up >> out of nowhere. It's like cockroaches, you can't seem to kill them all. >> Like cockroaches, there're persistent, yucky and totally useless. >> >> Jed, is one of those people who complain loudly about the bias in the Hot >> Fusion community against cold fusion, but he himself remains oblivious to >> the fact that he suffers the same malady when it comes to his pet theories. >> And he appeals to "majority authority" as vehemently as hot fusion >> researchers appeal to their "majority" status. One big difference though, >> these Hot fusion scientists probably know that they are being biased but >> continue in it for finanacial reasons (ie. Research grants), but Jed is >> simply deluded, blind and biased for no reason at all. No amount of facts, >> statistics and/or sound experiments will convince a person like Jed, It a >> religion to these people. >> >> Jojo >> >> >> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Robert McKay" <rob...@mckay.com> >> To: <vortex-l@eskimo.com> >> Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2012 11:53 PM >> Subject: Re: [Vo]:How bad is this news? Jed Rothwell >> >> >> >> On Tue, 4 Dec 2012 10:43:59 -0500, Jed Rothwell wrote: >>> >>>> Robert McKay wrote: >>>> >>>> I dont doubt that.. the climatologists themselves arent going to >>>>> benefit much either way (although Im sure many of them make a modest >>>>> livings out of it - and thats not nothing these days). Theyre merely >>>>> needed to produce those tedious reports.. they just need to keep >>>>> churning out talking points to keep the issue alive. >>>>> >>>> >>>> Look, that is ridiculous. People do not act that way! A person does >>>> not spend 5 or 10 years slaving away to get a PhD without being in >>>> love with the subject. You dont do that just to get some meaningless, >>>> dead-end job churning out fake data for corporations for 60 hours a >>>> week. >>>> >>> >>> I'm not saying they don't believe in what they're doing.. there must be >>> lots of legitimate data showing climate change.. the climate does change >>> after all. The point I was making that is that the climate science is >>> simply irrelevant to understanding global warming / "the climate change >>> issue" which is better understood as a political and financial phenomenon. >>> >>> I'm already regreting entering the discussion.. so I'll drop it, it >>> doesn't seem like we'll be reaching any kind of concensus. :) >>> >>> Rob >>> >>> >>> >> > > > -- > Daniel Rocha - RJ > danieldi...@gmail.com > >
