I repeat, what is your evidence for these bizarre statements, Jojo? On Jan 2, 2013, at 4:13 AM, Jojo Jaro wrote:
> I've already said, you can not enroll into this muslim school that Obama > enrolled in if you were not registered as a muslim. And any adoption of a > child by an Indonesian muslim man automatically makes the child a muslim. > That was the law. Research it my friend. > > > > Jojo > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: de Bivort Lawrence > To: vortex-l@eskimo.com > Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2013 12:23 PM > Subject: Re: [Vo]:Birther Myth? or Lomax lies > > Your statements about nationality and about adoption and nationality are > incorrect. > > What is your evidence for Obama being "registered as a Muslim"? > > > On Jan 1, 2013, at 1:11 AM, Jojo Jaro wrote: > >> While what you are saying about Indonesian schools may be true today - I am >> not knowledgeable about the current school system in Indonesia, so I will >> not debate that. >> >> While that may be true, it surely wasn't true in the 70's when Obama went >> there. Records show he was registered in that school as a muslim. >> >> >> One more thing, he was adopted by an Indonesian muslim. If he was adopted >> to be an Indonesian, he would have automatically lost his U.S. citizenship >> and gained Indonesian citizenship and automatically became a muslim. In >> Indonesia, you gain the religion of your adoptive father. Indonesia does >> not have and never had a "Dual Citizenship" program with the US. Which >> means that he would have had to reacquire his US citizenship when he reached >> 18. He had to do something to gain back his US citizenship. Which >> automatically made him a naturalized US citizen, not a Natural-Born US >> citizen required by our constitution. >> >> One of my cousins was in the same boat and he was born about the same time >> as Obama. He was born in U.S. soil (New York) but his parents brought him >> back to the Philippines. By US law, as a minor, he has no official >> citizenship status if there is a question as to his citizenship. In my >> cousin's case, he was born on US soil to Filipino parents. Hence, his >> citizenship status was in limbo, until he can make a decision when he turns >> 18. He can choose to be Filipino or US citizen. When my cousin turned >> 18, he had to go to the US Embassy to choose US citizen and get his papers >> (passport). He is considered a Naturalized US citizen. A person that has >> to take action to gain US citizenship is not a Natural Born US citizen. >> This is the status of Obama even if he was indeed born in Hawaii. He would >> still be a Naturalized US citizen and hence unqualified. >> >> So, as you can see, Obama is unqualified to be POTUS on many fronts. The >> argument about whether he was born in Hawaii or not is just one aspect of >> his qualification (non-qualification) to be POTUS. >> >> In a free society like America, such questions about his qualifications >> should have been vetted openly. If there was even a hint as to his >> qualifications, it should have been settled publicly and openly. Why don't >> people take this issue seriously. Even if people think that his BC was >> original and valid, people should still be calling for it to be settled once >> and for all. Open up the vault copy. No other steps or half measures will >> do. Great controversies require great measures to settle. Let the Birthers >> see it and it they are wrong, you get the chance to humiliate them to your >> heart's content. If I am wrong about this, I'm sure I will have great shame >> and tuck my tail between my legs and go away quietly. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Jojo >> >> >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: de Bivort Lawrence >> To: vortex-l@eskimo.com >> Sent: Tuesday, January 01, 2013 12:59 AM >> Subject: Re: [Vo]:Birther Myth? or Lomax lies >> >> The earlier posting on "muslim" schools is confused. >> >> Some "Muslim" schools have a curriculum that is based solely on the Qur'an. >> This kind of school would only attract non-Muslim students interested in the >> Qur'an, or in the culture of Islam. >> >> Some "Muslim" schools have a standard secular curriculum, and are attended >> mostly by Muslims, thus confusing some into calling them "Muslim" schools. >> >> Some "Muslim" schools are merely called such because they operate in a >> Muslim country, like Indonesia. This is like calling US public schools >> "Christian" because they operate in a predominantly Christian country. >> >> To suggest that President Obama must be a Muslim because he went to a >> "Muslim" school in Indonesia is a statement that at best is meaningless. >> >> >> On Dec 31, 2012, at 4:37 AM, Nigel Dyer wrote: >> >>> Indeed. There is a Catholic school in Birmingham, UK, where the majority >>> of pupils are Muslim >>> >>> http://www.birminghammail.co.uk/news/local-news/birminghams-catholic-school-where-90-of-the-pupils-231115 >>> >>> Nigel >>> >>> On 31/12/2012 04:40, Jojo Jaro wrote: >>>> Yes, "Christian" catholic schools are more tolerant of other faiths, but >>>> not muslims. You can not go to a muslim school like the one Obama went to >>>> unless you are a muslim. >>>> >>>> Before Lomax spins this again; may I simply ask readers to research this >>>> on their own to see which of us both is lying. >>>> >>>> >>>> Jojo >>>> >>> >> >
