On Fri Jan 25th Ed Storms said [snip] Cold fusion is a 2-body to 1 body 
reaction that violates this condition[/snip]. That might be correct from a 
purely syntax perspective but is an unfair oversimplification, LENR and cold 
fusion are forever associated with lattice and geometry defects in said lattice 
- this is a quantum effect /extreme - multibody in the equivalent sense where 
gas atoms react to changes in nano geometry. There is literature regarding 
cavity QED that indicates these changes in cavity geometry violate the square 
law and break the isotropy.
Regards
Fran

From: Edmund Storms [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Friday, January 25, 2013 10:38 AM
To: [email protected]
Cc: Edmund Storms
Subject: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:Chemonuclear Transitions

The human mind is able to imagine endless possibilities. In order to make any 
progress, a triage must be done by eliminating the ideas that are so improbable 
or so illogical that they have very little chance of being correct. That is 
what I'm attempting to do.

In any case, several basic rules MUST be considered. Hot fusion is a 
conventional 2 body-2 body reaction as is required to carry away the energy and 
momentum. Cold fusion is a 2-body to 1 body reaction that violates this 
condition. That violation MUST be acknowledged and explained.

People are not free to imaginary any thing. Certain rules are known to apply. 
These rules are so basic that they MUST not be ignored.

Ed Storms
On Jan 25, 2013, at 8:22 AM, Daniel Rocha wrote:


d+d=n+He3 and d+d=t+p

What about d+d+...+d=? We don't know. This is what many many particle models 
ends up being. Theyare  hot fusion. The only difference it is that there are 
many, more than 2>, incoming  nuclei to fuse. You cannot do that in experiments 
using colliders, it is too unlikely. So, you cannot say that cold fusion is any 
different than hot fusion that easily.

2013/1/25 Edmund Storms <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Yes, people try to explain LENR using the behavior described in the paper.


--
Daniel Rocha - RJ
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>

Reply via email to