The problem with such exchanges is that the messages to different
people cross so that I have to explain the same thing several times,
which is a waste of time. That is why I write papers so that everyone
can study the same explanation.
On Jan 25, 2013, at 9:51 AM, David Roberson wrote:
Ed, I am confused by your statement that cold fusion is a 2-body to
1 body reaction. I see two reaction components unless I am missing
something. One is the alpha particle and the other appears in the
form of mass released as energy into the surrounding structure.
The energy release must result from emission of something. Normally in
hot fusion, the release results from emission of a strong gamma when
He4 forms. This gamma is not present when He4 forms during cold
fusion. Why not? The mechanism of energy transfer is obviously not
conventional, yet it must be consistent with the law of conservation
of momentum. I try to solve this problem in my theory. Most people
ignore the issue.
Ed
Every observer must see that the laws of physics apply to what he
sees. My favorite point is to be located precisely between the two
protons as they head toward each other with exactly the same
energy. In this location an observer sees that a finite amount of
kinetic energy is measured for the two particles and that there is
exactly zero momentum for the equal velocity pair. When they
collide together, there is no motion required for the resulting
alpha particle until it releases the excess energy. When that
energy is finally emitted in some form, then a reaction force would
result in relative motion of the alpha particle. In this manner,
both conservation of energy as well as conservation of momentum is
shown.
In my experience, when these laws are seen by any one observer, then
they are true for all of the others. Do you see a hole in this
argument? How are the laws true for others but not for the one
ideally located?
Dave
-----Original Message-----
From: Edmund Storms <[email protected]>
To: vortex-l <[email protected]>
Cc: Edmund Storms <[email protected]>
Sent: Fri, Jan 25, 2013 10:38 am
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Chemonuclear Transitions
The human mind is able to imagine endless possibilities. In order to
make any progress, a triage must be done by eliminating the ideas
that are so improbable or so illogical that they have very little
chance of being correct. That is what I'm attempting to do.
In any case, several basic rules MUST be considered. Hot fusion is a
conventional 2 body-2 body reaction as is required to carry away the
energy and momentum. Cold fusion is a 2-body to 1 body reaction that
violates this condition. That violation MUST be acknowledged and
explained.
People are not free to imaginary any thing. Certain rules are known
to apply. These rules are so basic that they MUST not be ignored.
Ed Storms
On Jan 25, 2013, at 8:22 AM, Daniel Rocha wrote:
d+d=n+He3 and d+d=t+p
What about d+d+...+d=? We don't know. This is what many many
particle models ends up being. Theyare hot fusion. The only
difference it is that there are many, more than 2>, incoming
nuclei to fuse. You cannot do that in experiments using colliders,
it is too unlikely. So, you cannot say that cold fusion is any
different than hot fusion that easily.
2013/1/25 Edmund Storms <[email protected]>
Yes, people try to explain LENR using the behavior described in the
paper.
--
Daniel Rocha - RJ
[email protected]
