Has anyone tried producing this geometry via shattering of ultracold lattice material, ie immersing nickel in LNO and then confining the bulk while delivering an anvil blow? Fran
From: Axil Axil [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, February 18, 2013 12:58 PM To: [email protected] Subject: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:Defkalion GT experimental data available to selected members of the LENR research community The following is my thinking concerning a poor-man's technics that might get nanorods built on a Celani type wire or alternitively a nickel micro-powder. Step one is to build a homemade magnetron in a vacuum chamber that might produce nickel Nano-rods on an appropriate substrate. See how to build the magnetron here... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Uk_MZ22OVyg Step two is to place a nickel wire as pre-treated by Celani or a nickel micro-powder on the head of a magnet as a platform for sputtering. Step three is to perform sputtering as seen in the aforementioned YouTube video. Another way is to coat aluminum micro-powder used as a whisker template with nickel as a variant of this technique shown as follows: http://education.mrsec.wisc.edu/nanolab/nickel/index.html Cheers: Axil On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 12:05 PM, Harry Veeder <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: There must be poor-man technics that would get you part way there. The regularity and number of cracks would not be ideal, but at least it would be enough to test your theory. Harry On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 11:40 AM, Edmund Storms <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > My theory predicts that replication will only occur when the required gaps > are made by nanomachining or growth of nanomaterials having the preformed > required structure. All ordinary material makes cracks by a random process > that is totally uncontrolled and unpredictable. Unfortunately, such > machining requires money and skill that are not available to people in the > field. > > Ed > > > On Feb 17, 2013, at 11:19 PM, Kevin O'Malley wrote: > > > So ... we all look forward to when your theory allows the effect to be > replicated at will. When will that be? It seems that the closest person to > reach this goal is Hagelstein who says he will send out NANOR samples to be > replicated, or maybe Celani. > On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 2:37 PM, Edmund Storms > <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> > wrote: >> >> However, a useful theory would allow the active conditions to be >> described and created. This ability would allow the effect to be replicated >> at will. This ability would attract funding. > >
