This is the theory of gravity I like best. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Entropic_gravity#Erik_Verlinde.27s_theory
"There is no reasonable doubt concerning the physical reality of entropic forces, and no reasonable doubt that classical (and semi-classical) general relativity is closely related to thermodynamics [52–55]. Based on the work of Jacobson [1–6], Padmanabhan [7– 12], and others, there are also good reasons to suspect a thermodynamic interpretation of the fully relativistic Einstein equations might be possible. Whether the specific proposals of Verlinde [26] are anywhere near as fundamental is yet to be seen — the rather baroque construction needed to accurately reproduce n-body Newtonian gravity in a Verlinde-like setting certainly gives one pause" I believe it is the thermodynamic piece of the puzzle that Physics has missed for 2300 years since Aristotle thought a double rainbow was only an optical event even though the large double rainbows usually accompany a large thermodynamic upset in the atmosphere, like after Hurricane Sandy, Joplin, MO and others. Terry/Jed, if you look at the sky over Atlanta today you will see what look like gravity waves in those cirrus clouds above. Those would be entropic particle tracks according to my theory. The missing 95% is weakly interacting and orbiting right above us and around us, creating large thermodynamic upsets in our world at times that we call severe weather. Stewart darkmattersalot.com On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 1:46 PM, Kevin O'Malley <[email protected]> wrote: > Mark Gibbs <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> When I recently suggested in response to Peter Gluck's question [1] that >>> a testable theory was a necessity for LENR to be recognized as a great >>> invention [2], it sure seemed like you all disagreed. >>> >> >> > ***There currently is no accepted theory of gravity. There is a law of > gravity but no widely accepted theory. That didn't stop millions of people > from stepping onto airplanes and going for an anti-gravity ride on a great > invention. And in fact, when the Wright brothers got a patent for their > invention, they did not have to generate the equation of flight, did they? >
