Don't speak for everyone, you are the only unaccredited Bowery U professor
requesting homework while you advance more government conspiracy theories.
Dark energy/vacuum energy/ZPE whatever you want to call it makes up 95% of
the universe, it is about time we figure out where it is. Where do you
think it is? I think it is creating severe low pressure systems in our
atmosphere through vacuum and the Earth is orbiting into higher energy
particles all of the time. These high energy quantum particles also help
explain quantum gravity.
I don't think we live in a nice smooth constant entropy universe, plenty of
ripples right here on Earth.
What is the evidence for your theory? I am open to evidence. Do you have
secret government documents?
On Thursday, February 21, 2013, James Bowery wrote:
> We await with bated breath your homework.
>
> I found your posting a scattershot URL with a bunch of other links to
> various theories, none of which was anything like the theory I posit, to be
> typical of your reponses to pointed questions: Evasive.
>
> The only thing that might possibly be construed as related to my theory is
> this uncited sentence: "Other theories claim the meteorite itself was
> evidence of a new weapon." and the only possible backup for this sentence
> is a theory by a lone Russian politician claiming the weapon was _not_ a
> meteor.
>
> Keep it up, ChemE. Pretty soon no one is going to be interested in your
> trolls.
>
> On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 7:25 PM, ChemE Stewart
> <cheme...@gmail.com<javascript:_e({}, 'cvml', 'cheme...@gmail.com');>
> > wrote:
>
>> Hard to do math while driving and texting on my iPhone.
>>
>> Glad you liked the theories, the second was similar to yours and grouped
>> with the Mayans based on its merits.
>>
>>
>> On Thursday, February 21, 2013, James Bowery wrote:
>>
>>> No arithmetic worked out in response to my second challenge.
>>>
>>> A scattershot of a bunch "conspiracy" theories starting with a Mayan
>>> prophesies in response to my second challenge to come up with "a"
>>> (singular) URL to "a" (singular) "conspiracy" theory more plausible than my
>>> theory, which is not "conspiratorial" unless you include routine government
>>> classified work as "conspiratorial".
>>>
>>> On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 6:46 PM, ChemE Stewart <cheme...@gmail.com>wrote:
>>>
>>> Ok,
>>>
>>> The object was in a 2 body kepler orbit, formula on my site
>>>
>>> The 20' dia perfectly round hole in the lake with no object found was a
>>> nucleus with a bubble of condensed gas surrounding it. Last I read
>>> Authorities believe the round hole is a hoax because they cannot explain
>>> it, although they found fragments around the hole.
>>>
>>> The nucleus that struck the lake may have weighed much more than 10k
>>> tons. Without knowing the orbital path it is impossible to tell.
>>>
>>> Your answer:
>>>
>>> http://m.popsci.com/science/article/2013-02/best-russian-meteorite-conspiracy-theories
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thursday, February 21, 2013, James Bowery wrote:
>>>
>>> Completing the first part of my second challenge to ChemE for him the
>>> URL to the relevant arithmetic is (presumably):
>>>
>>> http://darkmattersalot.com/2013/02/03/number-crunching/
>>>
>>> But you must then search for the subheading:
>>>
>>> Typical Particle Orbit Calculations
>>>
>>> The second part of my second challenge to ChemE awaits the application
>>> of these equations to the phenomena of February 15, 2013.
>>>
>>> My first challenge to ChemE, defying him to come up with a URL to an
>>> "internet government conspiracy theory" that is more plausible than mine
>>> remains unanswered even in part.
>>>
>>> On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 5:35 PM, ChemE Stewart <cheme...@gmail.com>wrote:
>>>
>>> Darkmattersalot.com
>>> on the menu
>>>
>>> My unfalsifiable claim regarding cold fusion is still aliens farting
>>> through a wormhole, they are just playing with us.
>>>
>>> On Thursday, February 21, 2013, James Bowery wrote:
>>>
>>> The typical "internet government conspiracy theory" has to refer
>>> technologies that are far from being widely acknowledged to be mundane
>>> science and/or to programs that involve motives that are far from being
>>> widely acknowledged as being legitimate. I've made no such assumptions and
>>> I defy you to come up with a URL to a theory that is more plausible.
>>>
>>> On the other hand if you, at long last, have actually come up with
>>> arithmetic, you might try not only providing a URL instead of merely
>>> referring to some menu on some website, but applying that arithmetic in an
>>> explanation of the observe phenomena.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 5:15 PM, ChemE Stewart <cheme...@gmail.com>wrote:
>>>
>>> Actually I have calcs now on the menu on my site. I also show
>>> multi-body problem formulas and calculations for the core of the Earth. I
>>> have also been tracking orbits for 2 months and predicting low pressure
>>> systems. I am building an orbital model through the Google Earth API and
>>> fitting it to two Hurricane tracks from 2012. Also have a provisional
>>> patent filed.
>>>
>>> All you have is another government conspiracy theory I can find
>>> plastered all over the Internet.
>>>
>>> I have falsifiable claims, one being that double rainbows with a dark
>>> band are thermodynamic and pull a vacuum and cool and condense water vapor.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thursday, February 21, 2013, James Bowery wrote:
>>>
>>> Your don't have a theory, ChemE. You have a lot of words and pictures
>>> at a blog. No arithmetic. I've asked you for arithmetic repeatedly and
>>> you refuse to be forthcoming.
>>>
>>> Moreover, you pretend that I said nothing about classified information.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 4:50 PM, ChemE Stewart <cheme...@gmail.com>wrote:
>>>
>>> Wow, I
>>>
>>>
>
