The science, technology and even economics are all published in AIAA peer reviewed journals in papers whose arithmetic has withstood the test of decades. Limited by intellectual property rights, they are now openly advertised in the prospectus for Planetary Resources.
What I'm talking about isn't even as secret as was the Manhattan project, where significant technical problems involving isotope separation, critical mass and implosion systems had to be developed in secret. The military value of asteroid husbandry is at least as great as the military value of nuclear weaponry. You, on the other hand, have shown no homework. Only oracular rhetoric regarding everything from hurricanes to sinkholes -- and let us not forget that you intersperse these comments with "joking" asides regarding a variety of other phenomena that are as substantiated as your "serious" claims, so that it appears your entire presence here may be one big joke on vortex-l. Is it? On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 6:16 AM, ChemE Stewart <cheme...@gmail.com> wrote: > " could actually keep secret a project that was on the order of a few > tens of billions of dollars -- but there are reasons to believe this level > of secrecy is within the capability of the military." > > Right, your theory is locked within secret government documents. Mine is > open to falsify, with some fairly outrageous claims. > > Label it trolling or whatever you would like. Many on vortex are making > non-peer reviewed claims, many with merit. > > > On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 12:38 AM, Harry Veeder <hveeder...@gmail.com>wrote: > >> Clearly the "generator" at the back end is meant to carry clubs. >> http://ut-images.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/msl.jpg >> >> >> >> On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 12:28 AM, Harry Veeder <hveeder...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> > Curiosity serves as his robotic caddy. >> > >> > On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 9:27 PM, Terry Blanton <hohlr...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> Do you think Obama played a round of golf while visiting Mars? >> >> >> >> >
