You've been trolling vortex-l with our dark matter rhetoric, shoehorning just about anything of mild interest without so much as a single calculation that could be peer reviewed that even in a post-hoc analysis could be seen as validating your rhetoric.
While its true I don't speak for everyone, I'm certain that among the many who have fallen silent in response to your constant trolls there are a few who actually are open minded enough to look at something resembling real work from you. I'm among them actually, which is why I'm not simply silent. As far as my theory goes, I've already stated but to elaborate: The sources for asteroid mining are numerous, well established AIAA publications spanning decades and including current business plans by a company backed by major silicon valley venture financiers: Planetary Resources. The sensor technologies are likewise very old and mature although the specific technologies cited by Planetary Resources have been under deep black cover for decades with occasional glimpses leaked. The least plausible aspect of my theory is that anyone could actually keep secret a project that was on the order of a few tens of billions of dollars -- but there are reasons to believe this level of secrecy is within the capability of the military. On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 9:32 PM, ChemE Stewart <cheme...@gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks for keeping me awake I drove 10 hours today. Stalemate is OK with > me. > > > On Thursday, February 21, 2013, ChemE Stewart wrote: > >> Don't speak for everyone, you are the only unaccredited Bowery U >> professor requesting homework while you advance more government conspiracy >> theories. >> >> Dark energy/vacuum energy/ZPE whatever you want to call it makes up 95% >> of the universe, it is about time we figure out where it is. Where do you >> think it is? I think it is creating severe low pressure systems in our >> atmosphere through vacuum and the Earth is orbiting into higher energy >> particles all of the time. These high energy quantum particles also help >> explain quantum gravity. >> >> I don't think we live in a nice smooth constant entropy universe, plenty >> of ripples right here on Earth. >> >> What is the evidence for your theory? I am open to evidence. Do you >> have secret government documents? >> >> >> >> >> On Thursday, February 21, 2013, James Bowery wrote: >> >> We await with bated breath your homework. >> >> I found your posting a scattershot URL with a bunch of other links to >> various theories, none of which was anything like the theory I posit, to be >> typical of your reponses to pointed questions: Evasive. >> >> The only thing that might possibly be construed as related to my theory >> is this uncited sentence: "Other theories claim the meteorite itself was >> evidence of a new weapon." and the only possible backup for this sentence >> is a theory by a lone Russian politician claiming the weapon was _not_ a >> meteor. >> >> Keep it up, ChemE. Pretty soon no one is going to be interested in your >> trolls. >> >> On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 7:25 PM, ChemE Stewart <cheme...@gmail.com>wrote: >> >> Hard to do math while driving and texting on my iPhone. >> >> Glad you liked the theories, the second was similar to yours and grouped >> with the Mayans based on its merits. >> >> >> On Thursday, February 21, 2013, James Bowery wrote: >> >> No arithmetic worked out in response to my second challenge. >> >> A scattershot of a bunch "conspiracy" theories starting with a Mayan >> prophesies in response to my second challenge to come up with "a" >> (singular) URL to "a" (singular) "conspiracy" theory more plausible than my >> theory, which is not "conspiratorial" unless you include routine government >> classified work as "conspiratorial". >> >> On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 6:46 PM, ChemE Stewart <cheme...@gmail.com>wrote: >> >> Ok, >> >> The object was in a 2 body kepler orbit, formula on my site >> >> The 20' dia perfectly round hole in the lake with no object found was a >> nucleus with a bubble of condensed gas surrounding it. Last I read >> Authorities believe the round hole is a hoax because they cannot explain >> it, although they found fragments around the hole. >> >> The nucleus that struck the lake may have weighed much more than 10k >> tons. Without knowing the orbital path it is impossible to tell. >> >> Your answer: >> >> http://m.popsci.com/science/article/2013-02/best-russian-meteorite-conspiracy-theories >> >> >> >> On Thursday, February 21, 2013, James Bowery wrote: >> >> Completing the first part of my second challenge to ChemE for him the URL >> to the relevant arithmetic is (presumably): >> >> http://darkmattersalot.com/2013/02/03/number-crunching/ >> >> But you must then search for the subheading: >> >> Typical Particle Orbit Calculations >> >> The second part of my second challenge to ChemE awaits the application of >> these equations to the phenomena of February 15, 2013. >> >> My first challenge to ChemE, defying him to come up with a URL to an >> "internet government conspiracy theory" that is more plausible than mine >> remains unanswered even in part. >> >> On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 5:35 PM, ChemE Stewart <cheme...@gmail.com>wrote: >> >> Darkmattersalot.com >> on the menu >> >> My unfalsifiable claim regarding cold fusion is still aliens farting >> through a wormhole, they are just playing with us. >> >> On Thursday, February 21, 2013, James Bowery wrote: >> >> The typical "internet government conspiracy theory" has to refer >> technologies that are far from being widely acknowledged to be mundane >> science and/or to programs that involve motives that are far from being >> widely acknowledged as being legitimate. I've made no such assumptions and >> I defy you to come up with a URL to a theory that is >> >>
