Axil,
Would you posit this explains the spectrum shift in Mills
"Black Light" plasma? [snip] In plain language, when nano-particles are packed
together so that they touch in many places, the ability to downshift EMF from
high frequency to a lower frequency is increased by 5000 times with the of the
photon absorbed in the electric field between the nanoparticles. [/snip]
Fran
From: Axil Axil [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2013 12:35 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:Explaining Cold fusion -IV
http://nanophotonics.csic.es/static/publications/pdfs/paper203.pdf
Organized plasmonic clusters with high coordination number and extraordinary
enhancement in surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS)
<snip>In summary, we have shown that by using PF68 coating and emulsion
clustering it is possible to produce plasmonic nanoparticle molecules with high
symmetry and coordination index, and that they can be separated by applying
density gradient centrifugation. PF68 produces narrow interparticle gaps with
subsequent strong optical interactions while allowing the analytes to diffuse
inside the gaps, where gigantic electric fields are generated, as we have shown
by directly measuring the SERS enhancement in the clusters. Our geometrical
nanostructures not only open a new path for the investigation of optical
interactions between nanoparticles, but they also have great potential for
applications to sensing and nonlinear nanophotonics. <snip>
In plain language, when nano-particles are packed together so that they touch
in many places, the ability to downshift EMF from high frequency to a lower
frequency is increased by 5000 times with the of the photon absorbed in the
electric field between the nanoparticles.
This article indicates that the electric field between nano-particles goes up
exponentally with the number of particles that touch each other; and with
associated radiation shilding.
On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 4:45 PM, Axil Axil
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Recapitulating your famous quote as follows"
"Many explanations have been proposed that are based on imagined ways energy
could accumulate in sufficient amount in the chemical lattice to overcome the
Coulomb barrier, either directly or as result of neutron formation. These
processes also occasionally involve accumulation of extra electrons between the
hydrogen nuclei as another way to hide the barrier. These suggestions ignore
the severe limitations a chemical lattice imposes on energy accumulation and
electron structure. Some proposed processes even ignore obvious conflicts with
what has been observed. Consequently, none have been useful in directing future
research or have achieved universal acceptance."
Recent work in nanoplasmonics have demonstrated an electromagnetic field
amplification of 700 times in enhancement.
This amplification can be amplified through the strengthening of negative
charge accumulated in the lattice as well as particle size resonance matching
with the ambient heat of the system.
Ed you basic assumptions about charge accumulation are now proven to be
incorrect. Will you adjust your theory to reflect these new factors?
These nanoplasmonic experimental techniques can be adapted directly to LENR
research, Are you willing to run such experiments?
On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 4:34 PM, Edmund Storms
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Dave, what behavior of LENR can only be explained by proposing coupling between
the NAE sites? Of course, coupling is expected based on local temperature and a
photon flux. What more do you propose?
Ed
On Feb 24, 2013, at 2:26 PM, David Roberson wrote:
Robin,
The net energy released by a single fusion reaction is measured in the MeV, not
eV. That is why I believe that there is a mutual interaction between
individual NAE. The local heat energy release is large and can not escape the
area except through diffusion which is a slow process compared to the reaction
time associated with nuclear effects.
This should behave much like raising the local temperature by many degrees
Kelvin which should encourage reactions by nearby NAEs if we assume a positive
temperature coefficient for LENR.
Ed's theory handles activity at a single NAE that he states will continue until
completion. My suggested addition is a system level coupling that will now
explain other observations. When an addition improves a theory, it should be
incorporated into an improved one. Now we can consider the behavior of a
device exhibiting LENR as being composed of two different type of responses.
The first is the original one where NAE generate copious amounts of energy as
the elements within fuse. The addition explains craters and hot spots which
are hypothesized to be associated with the density of the NAE sites.
So far there has been no evidence that coupling does not exist between NAE and
a couple of good examples that suggest that this is happening. We should seek
out unusual behavior that does not meet expected performance and attempt to
explain the discrepancy. Do you know of any evidence that coupling between
active regions does not exist?
Dave
-----Original Message-----
From: mixent <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
To: vortex-l <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Sent: Sun, Feb 24, 2013 1:59 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Explaining Cold fusion -IV
In reply to Edmund Storms's message of Sun, 24 Feb 2013 11:26:37 -0700:
Hi,
[snip]
>You ask several questions at the same time. The LENR process requires
>energy to overcome a slight energy barrier present within the overall
>process. Consequently, it has a positive temperature effect. In other
>words, some energy is required to initiate each fusion event. Once
>initiated, each fusion reaction goes on without any more help and
>releases its energy. Consequently, the initiation reaction will
>become faster, the more energy that is applied in any form. This
>energy can take the form of increased temperature, laser light, RF or
>any other source that can couple to the rate limiting reaction. The
>important information comes from identifying the rate limiting step so
>that the extra energy can be applied more effectively. This requires a
>theory.
At the temperature increases common in LENR experiments, the amount of heat
energy added is only a tiny fraction of an eV. The theory that best matches this
is Hydrinos, because a tiny fraction of an eV is all that is needed to match the
difference in energy between the "energy hole" of Hydrinos, and the "energy
hole" provided by many common catalysts.
Regards,
Robin van Spaandonk
http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html
