In reply to James Bowery's message of Fri, 15 Mar 2013 17:05:34 -0500: Hi, [snip] >On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 4:49 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: > >> In reply to James Bowery's message of Fri, 15 Mar 2013 16:43:42 -0500: >> Hi, >> [snip] >> >Quoting from the conclusion of the article they reiterate the >> "explanation" >> >of the source of energy: >> > >> >"The di?erence in the latent heat between fog and bulk water is eventually >> >restored by heat in the atmosphere, which allows the fog to condense and >> >return to earth." >> > >> > >> >Does this make any sense to anyone? >> >> No. >> >> (I also think that their explanation is highly likely to be "not even >> wrong". ;) >> Regards, >> >> Robin van Spaandonk >> >> http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html >> >> >OK, so were the peer reviewers for J. Plasma Physics off their rockers?
I suspect they were as mystified by the results as everyone else and, unable to come up with an explanation of their own, simply let it stand. Regards, Robin van Spaandonk http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html
