On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 6:04 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: The sentence:- > > "The loss of intermolecular bond energy in the conversion from liquid to > fog > must be the source of the explosion energy." > > ... is the problem. First, they have the sign of intermolecular bond energy > wrong. When water *forms* Hydrogen bonds, energy is *released*, ergo, to > *break* > them *requires* energy, it doesn't magically produce more. > > The whole solar energy nonsense follows on from this first mistake. >
This seems like a big mistake, then. I wonder if an errata have been published. Eric
