If my memory serves me correctly, it was Dr. Peter Graneau who wrote:

"Ampere-Neumann Electrodynamics of Metals" 

which was advocating longitudinal forces.

 

In the latest issue of JSE is this interesting article:

 

The Journal of Scientific Exploration has just published its latest issue at
http://journals.sfu.ca/jse/index.php/jse. We invite you to review the Table
of Contents here and then visit our website to review articles and items of
interest.

 

Research Articles

 

Longitudinal Electromagnetic Waves? 

The Monstein-Wesley Experiment Reconstructed by Edward J. Butterworth,
Charles B. Allison, Daniel Cavazos, Frank M. Mullen

 

-Mark Iverson

 

From: James Bowery [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Friday, March 15, 2013 3:25 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Graneau Questions

 

 

On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 5:18 PM, <[email protected]> wrote:

In reply to  James Bowery's message of Fri, 15 Mar 2013 17:05:34 -0500:
Hi,
[snip]

>On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 4:49 PM, <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> In reply to  James Bowery's message of Fri, 15 Mar 2013 16:43:42 -0500:
>> Hi,
>> [snip]
>> >Quoting from the conclusion of the article they reiterate the
>> "explanation"
>> >of the source of energy:
>> >
>> >"The di?erence in the latent heat between fog and bulk water is
eventually
>> >restored by heat in the atmosphere, which allows the fog to condense and
>> >return to earth."
>> >
>> >
>> >Does this make any sense to anyone?
>>
>> No.
>>
>> (I also think that their explanation is highly likely to be "not even
>> wrong". ;)
>> Regards,
>>
>> Robin van Spaandonk
>>
>> http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html
>>
>>
>OK, so were the peer reviewers for J. Plasma Physics off their rockers?

I suspect they were as mystified by the results as everyone else and, unable
to
come up with an explanation of their own, simply let it stand.

Regards,

Robin van Spaandonk

http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html

 

That's very problematic given Figure 6.

 

They're showing >10 gain in that figure from E7 to E12.

 

How can plasma physicists who are staking their careers on billions of
dollars of investment to get to near break be so obsessively sadistic toward
claims like P&F which were far more modest, and let this slide?

Reply via email to