These cracks could prevent electrons and protons forming standard atoms of hydrogen and instead channel them together so they form much smaller structures such as a deflated hydrogen atom.
Harry On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 11:41 PM, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote: > > http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&frm=1&source=web&cd=2&cad=rja&sqi=2&ved=0CD4QFjAB&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.castl.uci.edu%2Fsites%2Fdefault%2Ffiles%2FSingle%2520Nanoparticle%2520SERES_Galley%2520Proof_121712.pdf&ei=kslFUYK3I8eX0QH9u4DwCQ&usg=AFQjCNE52ebdjSPkC101MgD1Obse3dYAvA&sig2=h58oP-5AUJVw13xOhIhVEw > > Structure Enhancement Factor Relationships in Single Gold Nanoantennas by > Surface-Enhanced Raman Excitation Spectroscopy > > In the parlance of Nanoplasmonics, a crack can be considered a nanoantenna. > > A optimally configured nanoantenna can amplify incoming EMF in the > infrared range by a factor of 500,000,000. > > I am showing you the path. What will you do with it? > > > Cheers: axil > > On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 11:20 PM, David Roberson <[email protected]>wrote: > >> I was thinking of something unusual this afternoon that I wanted to >> discuss. My mind wandered into thoughts about cold fusion within metals >> when It occurred to me that the hot fusion crowd was being very >> presumptuous to expect the same behavior during fusion reactions occurring >> within a metal matrix as is measured within a plasma. The environment is >> extremely different in these two cases and it seems to be out of line to >> extrapolate a system to this degree. For instance, the density of the >> reaction components is vastly different. The kinetic energy of these same >> nuclei could hardly be further apart either. And, it is well known that >> the hot fusion involves a plasma while cold fusion appears to work with >> normal atoms. >> >> Why would it not be a miracle if both types of behavior were similar? >> Who could have confidence that a fusion reaction taking place within the >> low temperature confines of a metal matrix would restrict the release of >> its nuclear energy to just the reacting particles and not include other >> very nearby atoms? This seems like a serious lack of imagination and >> insight. >> >> So, I have a question that seeks an answer. Is anyone aware of proof >> that hot fusion types of reactions have been observed within the confines >> of a metal matrix that is not subject to very massive energy inputs? For >> example, it would be too similar to a hot fusion environment to allow the >> reaction atoms to be accelerated by an electric field and rammed into a >> metal target. For this exercise I think we should restrict the processes >> to include cases where fusion is detected within the surface of the metal >> and without significant external energy inputs. >> >> Take the example of cold fusion that is initiated by muons. Have there >> been any situations where this has been observed while the hydrogen is >> contained within a metal? If so, what ash was observed and were gammas >> emitted by the process? Perhaps an interesting test would be to infiltrate >> a mixture of deuterium and tritium into a nickel or palladium matrix and >> allow muons to enter the fray. Someone may have already attempted this and >> it would be most informative for them to list the nuclear products that >> have been measured since this would simulate to a degree what we are >> expecting to observe with a typical cold fusion reaction. Would this test >> result in the generation of gammas? In what form would the energy be >> released? >> >> I realize that the addition of tritium might blur the results, >> particularly when the normal cold fusion processes do not contain it. For >> this reason, it might be interesting to only use regular hydrogen and >> deuterium at a lower expected reaction rate. I am most interested in >> determining whether or not the reaction energy is distributed among the >> local atoms or confined to the ones undergoing fusion as is seen in hot >> fusion. >> >> I would appreciate any responses from vortex members who have knowledge >> concerning these questions. >> >> Dave >> >> >
